Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

117
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
117
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

214
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
214
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

43.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
43.7K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

136
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
136
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

163
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
163
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

41.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
41.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Designed for Disparity: The Structural Origins of Migrant Farmworker Health Inequities in Maryland, 1900‒1950.

American journal of public health·2026
Same author

The recursive violence of reform: A century of failed interventions in migrant farmworker housing.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same author

Observational research in epidemic settings: a roadmap to reform.

BMJ global health·2025
Same author

Immigration, Mental Health and Psychosocial Well-being.

Medical anthropology·2021
Same author

Exceptionalism at the End of AIDS.

AMA journal of ethics·2021
Same author

Framing Environmental Health Decision-Making: The Struggle over Cumulative Impacts Policy.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same journal

Toward a typology of government-sanctioned child maltreatment: A scoping review of the harms of U.S. immigration enforcement.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of women in the slums of Guwahati city (Assam, India): A qualitative analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Is intersectionality selective? The role of collider bias.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Violence prevention through legislative change: Qualitative insights on ending the physical punishment of children in the UK.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Does education shield against vaccine hesitancy? Evidence from the East-West divide.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Health inequality aversion in China: Public and decision-maker views.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.6K

Intersectionality and syndemics: A commentary.

Thurka Sangaramoorthy1, Adia Benton2

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, USA.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|March 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Intersectionality and syndemics offer distinct frameworks for understanding health disparities. While integration is possible, syndemics may not enhance intersectional health scholarship, potentially undermining its focus on health equity.

Keywords:
Critical race studiesHIVHealth equityIntersectionalitySyndemics

More Related Videos

Using Coculture to Detect Chemically Mediated Interspecies Interactions
08:29

Using Coculture to Detect Chemically Mediated Interspecies Interactions

Published on: October 31, 2013

13.8K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.6K
Using Coculture to Detect Chemically Mediated Interspecies Interactions
08:29

Using Coculture to Detect Chemically Mediated Interspecies Interactions

Published on: October 31, 2013

13.8K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Social Epidemiology
  • Health Equity Studies

Background:

  • Intersectionality and syndemics are frameworks used to analyze health disparities.
  • Two studies examining LGBTQ+ Latinx men and young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) suggest integrating these frameworks.
  • Potential benefits include developing health equity interventions for marginalized populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the possibilities and challenges of integrating intersectionality and syndemics.
  • To critically evaluate the added value of syndemics to intersectional health disparity research.
  • To examine the methodological, ontological, and epistemological implications of combining these frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Commentary and critical analysis of existing literature and two case studies.
  • Comparative analysis of intersectionality and syndemics frameworks.
  • Examination of theoretical assumptions regarding interaction, additivity, and power structures.

Main Results:

  • While integration is feasible, syndemics may not offer additional benefits to intersectional health scholarship.
  • Assumptions of common ground may oversimplify theoretical differences.
  • Syndemics could potentially diminish the significance of intersectionality in addressing health equity.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating intersectionality and syndemics requires careful consideration of their distinct theoretical underpinnings and practical applications.
  • Syndemics may not inherently complement intersectional analyses of health disparities.
  • Prioritizing intersectionality's critical lens is crucial for advancing health equity research and interventions.