Evaluation of internet derived patient information for Acute Pancreatitis

Possibly In the UK there are currently over 26,000 patients admitted to hospital for acute pancreatitis per annum and the incidence is rising. 55% of patients consult the internet for information regarding their medical condition. As the number of people using the internet has increased 57% since 2006, it is increasingly important for medical professionals to direct patients to accurate online sources of information. This paper aims to evaluate the quality of information available online for acute pancreatitis.

The term 'acute pancreatitis' was searched using http://www.google.com, http://www.bing.com, and http://www.yahoo.com. The top 10 results of each of these websites were assessed using the University of Michigan consumer health website evaluation checklist.

Of the 30 websites found, 4 were excluded from the evaluation. Within the 26 evaluated websites there was high variability in website quality. However, the authors would have used 18 of the websites again for the purpose of finding out information on acute pancreatitis. 15 websites had a named author of which 11 displayed their credentials. 8 of the websites had been updated within the last year. 10 websites displayed a bias or conflict of interest. Generally, the layout and design of websites was good, however 7 of the websites contained distracting graphics and 9 of the websites had no search facility.

Doctors should give patients the information they want and need. With a high percentage of patients using the internet, medical professionals should recommend good quality websites to their patients. Engaging in this process could improve the consenting process as patients would be better informed. Good quality websites allows patients to explore conditions by themselves, with a re-consultation facilitating further discussion. Failure to engage in internet-based information risks patients making misinformed decisions due to bias and conflict of interest.