Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

09:31
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
12.2K
Arthroplasty of the Knee: Current Techniques for Implant Alignment
Patrick Weber1,2,3, Hans Gollwitzer1,2
1ECOM Group practice for orthopedic surgery, sports medicine and traumatology, Munich, Germany.
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie
|March 1, 2021
Summary
Traditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment may not satisfy all patients. Kinematic alignment TKA aims for personalized implantation, potentially improving function and achieving comparable long-term survival rates to traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomechanical engineering
- Medical device technology
Background:
- Traditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) mechanical alignment creates a straight leg, regardless of pre-operative alignment, leading to dissatisfaction in 15-20% of patients.
- Mechanical alignment techniques include ligament balancing and bony referencing, with both yielding comparable 25-year survival rates around 80%.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate the kinematic TKA alignment concept, designed to personalize implantation based on individual patient anatomy.
- To assess if kinematic alignment improves TKA function and achieves comparable long-term outcomes to traditional methods.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of traditional mechanical alignment (ligament balancing and bony referencing) with the newer kinematic alignment technique for TKA.
- Evaluation of implant positioning, ligament tension, and bony landmarks in mechanical alignment.
- Focus on reconstructing pre-arthritic anatomy, preserving the joint line, and maintaining the mechanical axis in kinematic alignment without ligamentous release.
Main Results:
- Kinematic TKA alignment aims to reconstruct patient-specific anatomy, potentially enhancing function.
- Initial studies indicate that TKA using kinematic alignment has comparable 10-year survival rates to traditional mechanical alignment.
- Both traditional and kinematic alignment techniques demonstrate comparable long-term survival rates.
Conclusions:
- Kinematic TKA alignment offers a personalized approach, potentially improving patient satisfaction and function.
- While kinematic alignment shows promise with comparable survival rates, long-term data is still limited.
- Further research is needed to determine the limitations of kinematic alignment and identify patient subgroups that benefit most.

