Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Prospective frequency and motion correction for edited 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Anouk Marsman1, Anna Lind1, Esben Thade Petersen2
1Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Motion correction in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is crucial for accurate brain metabolite measurements. Prospective motion correction significantly improves spectral quality for both conventional and edited MRS, especially for GABA and GSH detection.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Medical Imaging
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutathione (GSH) are vital brain neurometabolites implicated in neurological and psychiatric disorders.
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) non-invasively measures these metabolites but is highly sensitive to head motion, particularly in patient populations.
- Spectral editing techniques (e.g., HERMES) enhance GABA and GSH detection but increase motion sensitivity due to longer echo times and selective pulses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and correct motion sensitivity in conventional short-TE MRS (PRESS) and edited MRS (HERMES).
- To evaluate the efficacy of a navigator-based prospective motion correction strategy combined with retrospective outlier removal.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of a navigator-based prospective motion correction strategy with data reacquisition.
- Acquisition of PRESS and HERMES spectra under no-motion, motion-with-correction, and motion-without-correction conditions.
- Comparison of spectral quality and metabolite quantification across different motion and correction scenarios.
Main Results:
- Retrospective outlier removal alone was insufficient for edited MRS (HERMES), showing significant differences in metabolite estimates (tCr, GABA+, GSH) and spectral quality variability.
- Prospective motion correction, when combined with retrospective methods, significantly improved spectral quality in both PRESS and HERMES, approaching no-motion acquisition levels.
- No significant differences in GABA and GSH metabolite ratios were observed when motion correction was applied.
Conclusions:
- Edited MRS (HERMES) is more susceptible to motion artifacts compared to conventional MRS (PRESS).
- Prospective motion correction is effective in restoring spectral quality for both conventional and edited MRS, mitigating motion-induced artifacts.
- The combined prospective and retrospective correction strategy enhances the reliability of neurometabolite quantification in MRS studies.
More Related Videos
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014
10:06High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
Published on: May 10, 2012
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
NMR Spectrometers: Radiofrequency Pulses and Pulse Sequences
NMR Spectrometers: Overview
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
2D NMR: Overview of Homonuclear Correlation Techniques
COSY90 is the standard two-dimensional (2D) COSY experiment that...