Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Comparison of Joint Work During Load Absorption Between Weightlifting Derivatives
Timothy J Suchomel1, Matthew D Giordanelli2, Christopher F Geiser2
1Department of Human Movement Sciences, Carroll University, Waukesha, Wisconsin; and.
The jump shrug (JS) exercise requires more joint work and a longer loading duration for the hip, knee, and ankle compared to the hang power clean (HPC). Both exercises offer unique benefits for load absorption in athletic training.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Strength and Conditioning
Background:
- Understanding joint-level load absorption is crucial for optimizing athletic performance and injury prevention.
- Weightlifting derivatives like the hang power clean (HPC) and jump shrug (JS) are utilized for developing explosive power and strength.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the lower-extremity joint-level load absorption characteristics between the HPC and JS.
- To analyze joint work and duration at the hip, knee, and ankle during these exercises across various intensities.
Main Methods:
- Eleven Division I male lacrosse players performed HPC and JS at 30%, 50%, and 70% of their 1RM HPC.
- 3D motion capture and force plates were used to quantify joint work and loading duration.
- Statistical analysis included 3-way repeated-measures mixed ANOVAs and Cohen's d effect sizes.
Main Results:
- The JS demonstrated significantly greater load absorption joint work at the hip, knee, and ankle compared to the HPC across all tested loads.
- Loading duration was also significantly longer for the JS at all three joints compared to the HPC.
- These differences were consistently observed regardless of the percentage of 1RM HPC used.
Conclusions:
- The JS elicits greater hip, knee, and ankle joint work and a longer loading duration during the absorption phase compared to the HPC.
- Both HPC and JS have distinct load absorption profiles, suggesting they should be incorporated strategically based on specific training phase goals.
Related Concept Videos
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
Method of Superposition
When applying the method of superposition, each type of load—whether...
Machines: Problem Solving II
Work and Energy for Variable Forces

