Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

6.1K
Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
6.1K
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

428
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
428
What are Viruses?00:50

What are Viruses?

123.7K
Overview
123.7K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

7.0K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
7.0K
Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

3.1K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
3.1K
IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region01:03

IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region

1.5K
IR spectra are divided into two main regions: the diagnostic region and the fingerprint region. The diagnostic region of the spectrum lies above 1500 cm−1. The absorptions resulting from single-bond vibrations of the N–H, C–H, and O–H stretch at higher wavenumbers and appear on the left side of the spectrum. The stretching absorptions of the C≡C and C≡N occur between 2100–2300 cm−1. In contrast, those arising from stretching absorptions of the...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysis of Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Task Offloading and Resource Allocation in Fog Computing Environments.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Based Software as a Medical Device (AI-SaMD): A Systematic Review.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A Cyber Risk Assessment Approach to Federated Identity Management Framework-Based Digital Healthcare System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Short text topic modelling approaches in the context of big data: taxonomy, survey, and analysis.

Artificial intelligence review·2022
Same author

Clone tag detection in distributed RFID systems.

PloS one·2018
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K

Feature Subset Selection for Malware Detection in Smart IoT Platforms.

Jemal Abawajy1, Abdulbasit Darem2, Asma A Alhashmi2

  • 1Cyber Security Research and Innovation Centre, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examines how to improve the detection of malicious software on Android devices by selecting the most relevant data features. By using mathematical optimization, the researchers demonstrate that choosing specific subsets of information helps machine learning models identify threats more quickly and accurately.

Keywords:
Android OSInternet of Thingsfeature selectionfilter methodsmachine learningmalwaremalware detectionsmartphonesmachine learningcybersecurityquadratic programmingmobile security

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.1K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.1K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cybersecurity research within computer science
  • Feature subset selection in machine learning systems

Background:

No prior work had resolved the challenge of manually identifying malicious software within the rapidly expanding Android ecosystem. That uncertainty drove the adoption of automated machine learning techniques to address these security threats. Prior research has shown that the predictive power of these models depends heavily on the quality of input data. This gap motivated the investigation into how specific data attributes influence detection outcomes. Feature selection processes remain under-explored regarding their impact on computational efficiency in mobile environments. Current literature often overlooks the trade-offs between model precision and processing speed during threat identification. Researchers have identified that irrelevant data points can hinder the effectiveness of automated security tools. This study addresses how optimizing data inputs improves the performance of defensive software architectures.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to optimize the identification of malicious software by formulating feature selection as a quadratic programming problem. The researchers seek to understand how commonly used filter-based methods function within mobile security environments. They intend to compare various selection techniques to determine their impact on predictive precision. The team explores the relationship between the composition of selected features and overall model performance. This investigation addresses the practical difficulty of manually detecting threats in the rapidly evolving Android ecosystem. The authors aim to provide a clear assessment of how data refinement influences computational efficiency. They focus on identifying which strategies best support automated detection frameworks. This work intends to clarify the role of feature optimization in enhancing the reliability of security software.

Main Methods:

The researchers frame the selection challenge as a quadratic programming task to optimize data inputs. They conduct a comparative analysis of various filter-based techniques to evaluate their effectiveness. The team assesses how different methods influence the composition of selected attributes. They perform empirical evaluations to measure the predictive success of these algorithms. The study utilizes multiple learning models to test the robustness of the selection strategies. Investigators record the execution duration for each configuration to determine computational efficiency. This review approach synthesizes performance data across different algorithmic combinations. The design focuses on identifying the most efficient pathways for improving threat identification accuracy.

Main Results:

The experiments confirm that refining data inputs improves the predictive accuracy of learning models. Findings show that this process also significantly decreases the total run time for threat detection. The researchers observe that the performance of selection algorithms varies depending on the specific learning model employed. No single selection strategy consistently outperforms all other tested methods across every configuration. The data indicate that the composition of relevant features directly impacts the success of the detection process. The results highlight a trade-off between model precision and computational speed. The study provides evidence that automated selection is a practical requirement for modern security systems. These outcomes demonstrate that algorithmic compatibility is a key factor in achieving high-performance detection results.

Conclusions:

The authors demonstrate that selecting optimal data subsets improves the predictive precision of security models. Their findings indicate that reducing input dimensions also decreases the total execution time for threat analysis. The researchers suggest that the effectiveness of these selection methods fluctuates depending on the underlying learning algorithm. No single approach consistently outperforms all others across every tested configuration. The study implies that practitioners must evaluate multiple selection strategies to find the best fit for their specific security needs. These results confirm the necessity of data refinement for maintaining efficient mobile defense systems. The authors emphasize that performance variability remains a significant factor in selecting appropriate tools. This synthesis highlights the importance of matching specific selection techniques with compatible learning models for optimal results.

The researchers formulate the selection process as a quadratic programming problem. This mathematical approach allows them to identify the most relevant data attributes for distinguishing malicious software from benign applications.

The study evaluates filter-based methods. These techniques assess the statistical properties of data features independently of the learning model to rank their importance for threat identification.

The authors state that data refinement is necessary to improve model accuracy while simultaneously reducing the time required for processing. This optimization helps overcome the computational overhead associated with analyzing large feature sets.

The researchers utilize predictive accuracy and execution time as the primary metrics. These data points allow for a direct comparison between different selection algorithms and their impact on model performance.

The study measures performance across several learning algorithms. This approach reveals that the effectiveness of a selection method changes based on the specific model being used for classification.

The authors conclude that no single selection approach consistently outperforms others in every scenario. They suggest that developers should test multiple methods to achieve the best results for their specific platform.