Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

5.1K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
5.1K
Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

2.6K
Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
2.6K
Functional Classification of Joints01:09

Functional Classification of Joints

6.0K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses  or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
6.0K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

34.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
34.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond body vision: the extrastriate body area as a multisensory and social hub.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Correction: Somatotopy-independent reduction of audio-tactile intersensory facilitation for looming sounds within the peripersonal space during arm movements execution.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Integrating multiple sensory modalities during dyadic interactions drives self-other distinction at the behavioral and electrocortical level.

iScience·2026
Same author

Dopaminergic modulation of the sense of agency influences moral behavior in Parkinson's disease.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation highlights the functional role of the cortical pathway from the right inferior frontal gyrus to the primary motor cortex in motor inhibition.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Before the first bite: Do olfactory expectations shape gastric feelings and functions?

Neuron·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.2K

Competence-based social status and implicit preference modulate the ability to coordinate during a joint grasping

Sarah Boukarras1,2, Vanessa Era3,4, Salvatore Maria Aglioti4,5

  • 1Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. sarah.boukarras@uniroma1.it.

Scientific Reports
|March 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Induced social status affects how people coordinate movements with others. Lower preference for a low-status partner correlated with worse performance in joint motor tasks.

More Related Videos

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury
07:06

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Published on: March 21, 2025

869
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.2K
Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury
07:06

Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury

Published on: March 21, 2025

869
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Social status significantly impacts social perceptions.
  • Limited research exists on how induced social status influences dyadic coordination in motor interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of induced social status on dyadic coordination during a joint grasping task.
  • To determine if participants' performance in motor interactions is influenced by the social status of their partners.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in a game to establish competence-based social status hierarchies (high, middle, low).
  • Participants performed a joint grasping task with high- and low-status confederates in separate sessions.
  • Behavioral indexes, including interpersonal asynchrony and movement start time, were measured.

Main Results:

  • Participant performance, specifically interpersonal asynchrony, varied based on the social status of the interaction partner.
  • Performance with the low-status partner was modulated by the participant's preference for that partner.
  • A lower preference for a low-status confederate relative to a high-status confederate resulted in worse task performance.

Conclusions:

  • Induced social status influences dyadic coordination during motor interactions.
  • Interpersonal dynamics, such as partner preference, play a role in how social status affects motor task performance.
  • Social status is a key factor modulating performance in joint motor activities.