Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
Published on: August 8, 2014
Building resiliency to climate change uncertainty through bioretention design modifications
R Andrew Tirpak1, Jon M Hathaway2, Anahita Khojandi3
1Dept. of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, 590 Woody Hayes Dr., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Climate change impacts urban drainage. Bioretention cells need design modifications for future resilience. Increasing surface area is key for improved infiltration and reduced overflow.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Urban Hydrology
- Climate Change Adaptation
Background:
- Traditional urban drainage design assumes climate stationarity, which is challenged by global climate change.
- Green infrastructure, like bioretention cells, may not maintain service levels under future climate conditions.
- Climate change projections from General Circulation Models (GCMs) require downscaling by Regional Climate Models (RCMs), introducing model uncertainty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model bioretention cell performance using future climate projections.
- To determine design modifications for enhancing bioretention resilience to climate change.
- To assess the effectiveness of these modifications for new and retrofitted systems.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) for bioretention performance simulation.
- Acquired ten bias-corrected climate projections from the North American Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (NA-CORDEX) using Kernel Density Distribution Mapping (KDDM).
- Evaluated multiple design modification scenarios using a probabilistic approach.
Main Results:
- Significant design modifications (increased ponding depths, media thickness, conductivity, and surface area) greatly improved historic performance metrics.
- All ten future climate scenarios showed increased infiltration and decreased surface overflow with substantial design changes.
- Conservative modifications alone yielded lower performance, with some models falling below historic infiltration and overflow volumes.
Conclusions:
- Increasing bioretention surface area relative to the catchment is the most effective strategy for maintaining historic performance under future climate conditions.
- Prioritize larger surface areas in locations with poor in situ soil drainage.
- Local site conditions and management goals are crucial for designing resilient bioretention systems against climate change uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment

