Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 13, 2025

Hybrid PET/MRI Imaging of Alzheimer's Disease Based on 18F-AV-1451
Published on: April 18, 2025
Toward a Universal Readout for 18F-Labeled Amyloid Tracers: The CAPTAINs Study
Gérard N Bischof1, Peter Bartenstein2, Henryk Barthel3
1University Hospital Cologne, Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cologne, Germany; gerard.bischof@uk-koeln.de.
Comparing visual rating protocols for amyloid PET tracers in Alzheimer disease (AD) showed high agreement among experts, suggesting standardization is possible. Different protocols had varying impacts on nonexpert raters, highlighting a need for unified guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Neurology
- Radiochemistry
Background:
- Three 18F-labeled PET tracers are approved for assessing cerebral amyloid plaque pathology in suspected Alzheimer disease (AD).
- Existing visual rating protocols approved by regulatory agencies differ across these tracers, despite similar scanning procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the comparability of three approved visual rating protocols for amyloid PET tracers.
- To assess the performance of these protocols when applied by experts and nonexperts in classifying scans as amyloid-positive or -negative.
Main Methods:
- An international multicenter study involved expert and nonexpert raters evaluating scans from 18F-florbetaben, 18F-florbetapir, and 18F-flutemetamol.
- Scans were rated using all three approved visual rating protocols in a randomized order, with raters blinded to the tracer used.
- Metrics analyzed included visual reader agreement, interrater reliability, and agreement with quantitative measures, stratified by rater expertise.
Main Results:
- Experts showed no significant differences in agreement metrics across the visual rating protocols, indicating robustness.
- Nominal differences favored the 18F-florbetaben protocol for higher interrater reliability and accuracy, particularly under low confidence.
- Nonexpert raters exhibited significant protocol-dependent differences, with moderate-to-fair accuracy and the 18F-florbetapir protocol showing the highest reliability.
Conclusions:
- High interrater agreement was observed across all 18F-labeled amyloid tracers, irrespective of the visual rating protocol used, especially among experts.
- Visual interpretation of amyloid PET imaging appears to be highly standardizable and independent of the specific protocol for experienced readers.
- Developing a universal visual assessment protocol for all amyloid imaging tracers is feasible and could significantly aid less experienced readers.
More Related Videos
08:25Detecting Amyloid-β Accumulation via Immunofluorescent Staining in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: April 19, 2021
12:04Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting-Radioligand Treated Tissue FACS-RTT to Determine the Cellular Origin of Radioactive Signal
Published on: September 10, 2021