Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

10:46
Diffusion Imaging in the Rat Cervical Spinal Cord
Published on: April 7, 2015
11.9K
Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment
Tsukasa Yoshida1,2, Atsushi Urikura3, Yoichiro Hosokawa4
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Sunto, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan. ts.yoshida@scchr.jp.
Radiological Physics and Technology
|March 16, 2021
Summary
This study shows that 3.0-T MRI scanners provide accurate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, even with thin 1-mm slices. These findings support reliable ADC quantification in MRI imaging.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biophysics
Background:
- Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification is crucial for various medical imaging applications.
- Thin-slice imaging offers potential benefits in scan time and spatial resolution.
- Assessing measurement error and repeatability is vital for clinical translation of imaging techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the measurement error and repeatability of ADC values derived from thin-slice diffusion-weighted imaging.
- To compare the performance of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI scanners for ADC measurement using different slice thicknesses.
- To determine the reliability of ADC measurements with 1-mm slice thickness for clinical applications.
Main Methods:
- Diffusion-weighted images were acquired from an ice-water phantom using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm slice thicknesses.
- ADC maps were generated at b-values of 0 and 1000 mm²/s across five consecutive scans.
- Measurement accuracy, precision, and repeatability (within-subject coefficient of variation) were assessed.
Main Results:
- ADC accuracy for both scanners aligned with the known ADC of water at 0°C.
- For 1-mm slices, the 3.0-T scanner demonstrated higher precision (2.9%) compared to the 1.5-T scanner (8.4%).
- Repeatability for 1-mm slices was superior on the 3.0-T scanner (1.3%) versus the 1.5-T scanner (3.4%).
Conclusions:
- The 3.0-T scanner exhibits acceptable measurement errors and moderate repeatability, meeting Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance recommendations.
- Reliable ADC measurements are achievable with a 3.0-T scanner even at 1-mm slice thickness.
- Thin-slice (1-mm) imaging on a 3.0-T scanner is feasible for accurate ADC quantification within reasonable scan times.

