Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Laser Capture Microdissection of Mouse Embryonic Cartilage and Bone for Gene Expression Analysis
Published on: December 18, 2019
Optimizations for identifying reference genes in bone and cartilage bioengineering
Fei Xiong1, Xiangyun Cheng2, Chao Zhang2
1Department of Sports Medicine, Wuxi 9th People's Hospital affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Selecting appropriate reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) is crucial for accurate gene expression analysis. This study found that the minimum Vn/n+1 scheme is superior for tissue samples like skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, ensuring reliable results.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Molecular Biology
- Bioengineering
Background:
- Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a key method for gene expression analysis.
- Inappropriate reference gene selection can lead to inaccurate results and misinterpretations.
- Optimal reference gene selection guidelines, like the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE), are still debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the most feasible reference gene identification schemes for bone and cartilage bioengineering.
- To investigate reference gene selection in rat bone mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs), skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue undergoing specific inductions.
- To ensure stable and accurate gene expression interpretation in bone and cartilage bioengineering.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of stability and pairwise variance of eight candidate reference genes using the geNorm algorithm.
- Comparison of different normalization schemes (V0.15, Vmin, V0.20, Opt3) across different tissue types.
- Evaluation of the impact of selection schemes on target gene normalization and expression levels.
Main Results:
- In rBMSCs, the V0.15 and Vmin schemes had no significant effect on target gene normalization.
- For skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, different normalization schemes significantly impacted target gene normalization.
- The Vmin scheme demonstrated a superior mode for generating accurate gene expression results in specific tissue types.
Conclusions:
- The proposed Vn/n+1 cut-off value of 0.15 should be used cautiously, especially with certain tissue types.
- For cell-based experiments (e.g., rBMSCs), a Vn/n+1 under 0.15 is sufficient for RT-qPCR.
- For skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, the minimum Vn/n+1 scheme is recommended for accurate gene expression analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Bone Remodeling
Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification

