Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

1.5K
The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
1.5K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.8K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.8K
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

1.4K
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
1.4K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.2K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.2K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

714
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
714
Data Collection III01:05

Data Collection III

3.7K
The physical assessment examines the patient for objective data that defines the patient's condition, and aids in formulating the nursing care plan. The purpose of physical assessment is a health status appraisal, which includes identifying health problems, and establishing a database for nursing intervention.
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Moment of Silence: Pamela J. Brink (September 24, 1933-August 5, 2025).

Western journal of nursing research·2025
Same author

Editorial Farewell.

Qualitative health research·2021
Same author

Implementation and Outcomes of a Telehealth Neonatology Program in a Single Healthcare System.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2021
Same author

Hospital bed height influences biomechanics during bed egress: A comparative controlled study of patients with Parkinson disease.

Journal of biomechanics·2020
Same author

A Moment of Silence.

Qualitative health research·2020
Same author

An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2016
Same journal

Institutional Determinants of Health: Adolescent Health Crises as Sites of Social Intervention and Practical Reform.

Qualitative health research·2026
Same journal

Making Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Mediated Translation Visible: A Minimum Disclosure Standard for Qualitative Health Research.

Qualitative health research·2026
Same journal

Navigating Life's End: Task-Centered Versus Event-Centered Orientations Among Respiratory Therapists Withdrawing Mechanical Ventilation.

Qualitative health research·2026
Same journal

A Sudden Deprivation: Children's Experiences of Pediatric Intensive Care and Delirium Explored Through Photovoice.

Qualitative health research·2026
Same journal

Doing Alcohol Research Differently: Considerations During Research With Romany Gypsy and Traveller Communities - A Narrative Review With Methodological and Ethical Considerations.

Qualitative health research·2026
Same journal

Relative Hope, Relative Care: Parkinson's Disease Family Carers on Hope and Evolving Care.

Qualitative health research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

416

Why the Qualitative Health Research (QHR) Review Process Does Not Use Checklists.

Janice Morse1

  • 1The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Qualitative Health Research
|March 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Checklists in research manuscripts are intended to ensure quality and transparency but often fail to assess the substance of the work. These rigid criteria, particularly in qualitative research, risk undermining genuine scientific inquiry and findings.

Keywords:
methodologypractice guidelinesqualitativeresearch design

More Related Videos

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
04:54

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

4.9K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

416
Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
04:54

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

4.9K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Qualitative Research Methodology
  • Scientific Publishing Standards

Background:

  • Checklists are commonly used in manuscript preparation to signal quality, transparency, and rigor.
  • These tools typically list strategies for rigor and transparency, with authors indicating presence and location within the manuscript.

Discussion:

  • Current checklists focus on mechanical aspects of data management, neglecting the research product's originality, substance, and contribution.
  • The application of criteria from systematic reviews and clinical trials to qualitative research is paradoxically undermining its quality.
  • Authors and reviewers may rely on checklist items (e.g., 'data saturation') as proxies for actual content, potentially replacing thorough article evaluation.

Key Insights:

  • Checklists, while aiming for rigor, often overlook the core value and contribution of research findings.
  • The overreliance on checklist compliance can lead to superficial evaluation, where meeting criteria becomes more important than the research's actual merit.
  • Qualitative inquiry is particularly vulnerable to the misapplication of quantitative research standards, potentially invalidating findings.

Outlook:

  • There is a need to develop evaluation methods that capture the true substance and originality of qualitative research.
  • Future research should explore how to balance methodological rigor with the unique demands and contributions of qualitative inquiry.
  • Revising publication guidelines to better reflect the nuances of qualitative research is crucial for preserving its integrity.