Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Leaks after Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Ignored or Neglected?
Sun-Joo Jang1, S Chiu Wong2, Bobak Mosadegh3
1Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure prevents strokes in atrial fibrillation patients. Incomplete closure can cause leaks, but their link to blood clots needs more research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Thrombosis Prevention
Background:
- Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative stroke prevention method for atrial fibrillation patients unable to use oral anticoagulation.
- Incomplete LAA closure, due to device design and anatomical variations, can result in peri-device leaks (PDLs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical significance of PDLs after LAA closure procedures.
- To discuss the association between PDLs and thromboembolic events.
- To highlight challenges in managing severe leaks and the need for further research.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on LAA closure and PDLs.
- Analysis of current evidence regarding PDL size and thromboembolic risk.
- Discussion of management strategies for PDLs.
Main Results:
- Residual leaks (PDLs) are common after LAA closure, irrespective of the method used.
- PDLs <5 mm have not been definitively linked to increased thromboembolic risk.
- Leaks after epicardial LAA closure correlate with increased thromboembolism risk.
Conclusions:
- The clinical significance of PDLs, especially smaller ones, remains controversial and requires further investigation.
- Management of severe PDLs is challenging.
- Large, long-term studies are needed to clarify the role of PDLs in predicting thromboembolic events and to establish optimal management strategies.
Abstract:
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has recently been approved as an alternative management for stroke prevention in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have difficulties with long-term oral anticoagulation. The various shapes and sizes of LAA and orientation of the atrial ostium may contribute to the incomplete LAA closure from circular design devices and orientation of the non-steerable delivery catheter. Incomplete closure of LAA leads to a high-velocity blood flow through the peri-device gap, resulting in peri-device leak (PDL). Residual leaks are frequently diagnosed after LAA closure procedures, regardless of closure methods. There is a controversy in the clinical significance of the leaks, particularly about its association with thromboembolic events. PDL <5 mm was not associated with any increase of risk for thromboembolism. Current literatures with small study population have not been sufficient to clarify the role of the leaks after LAA closure. Nevertheless, management of severe leaks has been a challenging concern for cardiologists. Leaks after epicardial LAA closures are at the neck of the incompletely closed LAA and have shown to increase the risk of thromboembolism. Percutaneous closure of the leaks after LAA closure has been attempted with good safety and success, but long-term safety and efficacy remains unclear. Further large long-term studies which aim to assess the role of leaks or PDLs in predicting thromboembolic events and management strategies are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

