Controversy: For or against thyroid lobectomy in>1cm differentiated thyroid cancer?

In this controversy article, the respective advantages of lobectomy vs. total thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid cancers are argued. The authors conclude that lobectomy has the same oncological prognosis as thyroidectomy in terms of specific survival or recurrence, in case of low risk of recurrence (T1-2N0). However, as a precaution, and taking into account current data, thyroidectomy is recommended in N0 thyroid papillary cancers with aggressive subtype, with even minimal infiltration of perithyroid tissue and/or vascular invasion, and in N1 cancers with more than 5 lymphadenopathies or lymphadenopathies with a major axis greater than or equal to 0.2cm. Other forms of papillary cancer should be treated with lobectomy, as risk of morbidity is low and hospital stay is short. Lobectomy allows reliable monitoring, especially by ultrasound. On the other hand, total thyroidectomy, despite a higher rate of surgical complications due to the risk of recurrent paralysis and permanent hypoparathyroidism, is nevertheless preferable to lobectomy. Indeed lobectomy is not always avoiding hormone replacement therapy, for more precise monitoring by thyroglobulin assay, which is an uninterpretable tool after lobectomy but allows early diagnosis of local or metastatic recurrence with reducing mortality. Thus, in situations where the diagnostic criteria for high-risk cancer are not rigorously determined or taken into account, thyroidectomy is recommended. In addition, it will remain preferable as long as the recommendations for administration of radioactive iodine do not change in favor of use reserved for high-risk cancers as in US guidelines.