Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025
06:18
A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
9.3K
The Language of Self-Injury: A Data-Informed Commentary
Penelope A Hasking1, Mark E Boyes1, Stephen P Lewis2
1School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
|March 25, 2021
Summary
Researchers and clinicians often use stigmatizing language when discussing nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Adopting person-centered language is crucial for respectful communication about self-injury experiences.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Clinical Research
- Sociolinguistics
Background:
- Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a complex behavior often used for emotional regulation.
- The language surrounding NSSI contributes significantly to its associated stigma.
- Understanding clinician and researcher terminology is vital for improving communication.
Discussion:
- This commentary analyzes language used by clinicians and researchers regarding NSSI.
- A disparity exists between the language used and language deemed appropriate by stakeholders.
- Underuse of person-centered terms (e.g., 'person with lived experience of self-injury') was observed.
Key Insights:
- Clinicians and researchers may not consistently use the most appropriate and respectful language for NSSI.
- Person-centered language is preferred by individuals with lived experience of self-injury.
- Current terminology can perpetuate stigma rather than reduce it.
Outlook:
- Promoting mindful and respectful language in NSSI research and clinical practice is essential.
- Adopting person-centered approaches can help destigmatize NSSI.
- Future research should explore the impact of language on therapeutic relationships and outcomes.
