Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Assessment of Intestinal Transcytosis of Neonatal Escherichia coli Bacteremia Isolates
Published on: February 17, 2023
Antibiotic use for inpatient newborn care with suspected infection: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study
Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman1, Aniqa Tasnim Hossain2, Sojib Bin Zaman2
1Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68 Shahid Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ehsanur@icddrb.org.
Insights
Mothers accurately reported neonatal ward admission but underestimated infection and antibiotic details. Inpatient records are recommended for tracking quality of neonatal infection management.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Millions of neonates annually need inpatient care for life-threatening infections.
- Accurate antibiotic management is critical but lacks routine coverage measurement.
- The EN-BIRTH study validated indicators for measuring care quality in hospitalized neonates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate maternal self-reports of antibiotic coverage for hospitalized neonates with infections.
- To assess the accuracy of exit survey data compared to clinical records.
Main Methods:
- The study involved 1015 neonates with infections across five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tanzania.
- Clinical management data from inpatient case notes served as the gold standard.
- Exit surveys of mothers were compared to case note data using meta-analysis.
Main Results:
- 96.7% of neonates received injectable antibiotics, but only 14.5% completed the recommended 7-day course.
- Mothers accurately reported neonatal ward admission (98.8%) but struggled with diagnosis (47.1%) and correct antibiotic names (12.3%).
- Laboratory diagnostic use was low, with only 10.6% of babies having blood cultures.
Conclusions:
- Maternal reports underestimated infection and antibiotic treatment details.
- Neonatal ward admission reporting shows potential for household survey indicators.
- Strengthening laboratory diagnostics and standardizing inpatient records are crucial for tracking neonatal infection management quality.
Background:
An estimated 30 million neonates require inpatient care annually, many with life-threatening infections. Appropriate antibiotic management is crucial, yet there is no routine measurement of coverage. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study aimed to validate maternal and newborn indicators to inform measurement of coverage and quality of care. This paper reports validation of reported antibiotic coverage by exit survey of mothers for hospitalized newborns with clinically-defined infections, including sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia.
Methods:
EN-BIRTH study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tanzania (July 2017-July 2018). Neonates were included based on case definitions to focus on term/near-term, clinically-defined infection syndromes (sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia), excluding major congenital abnormalities. Clinical management was abstracted from hospital inpatient case notes (verification) which was considered as the gold standard against which to validate accuracy of women's report. Exit surveys were conducted using questions similar to The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) approach for coverage of childhood pneumonia treatment. We compared survey-report to case note verified, pooled across the five sites using random effects meta-analysis.
Results:
A total of 1015 inpatient neonates admitted in the five hospitals met inclusion criteria with clinically-defined infection syndromes. According to case note verification, 96.7% received an injectable antibiotic, although only 14.5% of them received the recommended course of at least 7 days. Among women surveyed (n = 910), 98.8% (95% CI: 97.8-99.5%) correctly reported their baby was admitted to a neonatal ward. Only 47.1% (30.1-64.5%) reported their baby's diagnosis in terms of sepsis, meningitis, or pneumonia. Around three-quarters of women reported their baby received an injection whilst in hospital, but 12.3% reported the correct antibiotic name. Only 10.6% of the babies had a blood culture and less than 1% had a lumbar puncture.
Conclusions:
Women's report during exit survey consistently underestimated the denominator (reporting the baby had an infection), and even more so the numerator (reporting known injectable antibiotics). Admission to the neonatal ward was accurately reported and may have potential as a contact point indicator for use in household surveys, similar to institutional births. Strengthening capacity and use of laboratory diagnostics including blood culture are essential to promote appropriate use of antibiotics. To track quality of neonatal infection management, we recommend using inpatient records to measure specifics, requiring more research on standardised inpatient records.
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Antibiotic Selection

