Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

420
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
420
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

499
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
499

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Calcar Buttress Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation (BDSF) Using a Locking Compression Screw System for Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures: A Prospective Observational Study.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Mechanistic Insights into metformin's neuroprotective effects against drug-induced neurotoxicity.

Metabolic brain disease·2026
Same author

Distributed control circuits across a brain-and-cord connectome.

Nature·2026
Same author

EUS-Guided FNA: Cracking the Diagnostic Dilemma of Unexplained Low Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient (SAAG) Ascites.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same author

Multidisciplinary Management of Paediatric Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction at a Tertiary Hospital: A Five-Year Review.

Cureus·2026
Same author

EVA-centric QUBO optimization for active and reactive power coordination in DLMP-driven distribution systems.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K

Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.

Anthony I Jang1, Ravi Sharma2, Jan Drugowitsch1

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

Elife
|March 26, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Humans don't process all choices equally; visual attention and fixation duration influence decisions. Our new model explains this bias, showing attention optimizes information gathering for better decision-making.

Keywords:
decision-makingdiffusion modelshumanneuroscienceoptimalityvisual attention

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.3K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.3K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Neuroscience

Background:

  • Traditional decision-making models assume equal attention to all options.
  • Human decision-making involves alternating visual fixation between items.
  • Fixation duration causally influences choices, biasing them toward longer-fixated items.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive a normative decision-making model incorporating attention and active fixation control.
  • To explain fixation-related choice biases using a Bayesian computational framework.
  • To investigate the impact of attention allocation on decision performance.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a normative decision-making model where attention enhances information reliability.
  • Incorporation of active control of fixation changes to optimize information gathering.
  • Validation against human choice data and prediction of new phenomena.

Main Results:

  • The model reproduces human fixation-related choice biases.
  • A Bayesian computational rationale for attention-driven biases was provided.
  • Optimal decision performance is achieved with a balanced resource spread between attended and unattended items.

Conclusions:

  • Attention dynamically modulates information processing and guides fixation for optimal decision-making.
  • The model offers a unified framework for understanding attention, fixation, and choice biases.
  • Resource allocation between attended and unattended information is critical for efficient decision performance.