Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Gender and Malingering in Defendants Deemed Incompetent to Stand Trial
Ariana E Nesbit-Bartsch1, Barbara E McDermott2, Katherine D Warburton2
1Dr. Nesbit-Bartsch is a Forensic Psychiatrist, San Diego County Forensic Psychiatry Clinic, San Diego, CA. Dr. McDermott is Professor and Research Director at Napa State Hospital, University of California-Davis Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Sacramento, CA. Dr. Warburton is Medical Director, California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, CA. contact@ariananesbit-bartschmd.com.
Gender bias in malingering assessments is prevalent. This study found evaluators perceived higher rates of malingering in men compared to women, despite similar feigned symptom scores.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Psychiatry
- Legal Medicine
Background:
- Malingering, the feigning of symptoms for external gain, is a significant concern in forensic evaluations.
- Existing literature has minimally explored the influence of gender on malingering detection and diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential gender-based disparities in the assessment of malingering among individuals found incompetent to stand trial.
- To identify factors contributing to perceived gender differences in malingering rates.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 1,748 patients evaluated for competency to stand trial between 2008 and 2017.
- Utilized a structured assessment tool for feigned psychiatric symptoms.
- Examined demographic variables, symptom presentation, and criminal history.
Main Results:
- Men (23%) were perceived as malingering at higher rates than women (15%) by evaluators.
- Objective scores for feigned psychiatric symptoms showed only minor differences between genders.
- Symptom patterns and criminal arrest history were associated with perceived malingering.
Conclusions:
- Evaluator perceptions of malingering appear to be influenced by gender, independent of objective symptom presentation.
- Gender differences in malingering rates may be linked to specific symptom constellations and prior legal involvement.
- Further research is needed to address potential biases in forensic assessments.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Dissociative Amnesia
Stereotype Content Model
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...

