Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 11, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
High-Spatial-Resolution Multishot Multiplexed Sensitivity-encoding Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Improved Quality of
Isaac Daimiel Naranjo1, Roberto Lo Gullo1, Elizabeth A Morris1
1Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (I.D.N., R.L.G., E.A.M., T.L., K.P., S.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy (R.L.G.); MR Application and Workflow Team, GE Healthcare, New York, NY (M.M.F.); MR Application and Workflow Team, GE Healthcare, Boston, Mass (A.G.); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Molecular and Gender Imaging Service, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (K.P.); and Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (S.B.T.).
Abstract:
Multishot multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging is a feasible and easily implementable routine breast MRI protocol that yields high-quality diffusion-weighted breast images.Purpose: To compare multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and single-shot DWI for lesion visibility and differentiation of malignant and benign lesions within the breast.Materials and Methods: In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, both MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI sequences were first optimized in breast phantoms and then performed in a group of patients. Thirty women (mean age, 51.1 years ± 10.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 27-70 years) with 37 lesions were included in this study and underwent scanning using both techniques. Visual qualitative analysis of diffusion-weighted images was accomplished by two independent readers; images were assessed for lesion visibility, adequate fat suppression, and the presence of artifacts. Quantitative analysis was performed by calculating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and image quality parameters (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] for lesions and fibroglandular tissue; contrast-to-noise ratio) by manually drawing regions of interest within the phantoms and breast tumor tissue. Interreader variability was determined using the Cohen κ coefficient, and quantitative differences between MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test; significance was defined at P < .05.Results: MUSE DWI yielded significantly improved image quality compared with single-shot DWI in phantoms (SNR, P = .001) and participants (lesion SNR, P = .009; fibroglandular tissue SNR, P = .05; contrast-to-noise ratio, P = .008). MUSE DWI ADC values showed a significant difference between malignant and benign lesions (P < .001). No significant differences were found between MUSE DWI and single-shot DWI in the mean, maximum, and minimum ADC values (P = .96, P = .28, and P = .49, respectively). Visual qualitative analysis resulted in better lesion visibility for MUSE DWI over single-shot DWI (κ = 0.70).Conclusion: MUSE DWI is a promising high-spatial-resolution technique that may enhance breast MRI protocols without the need for contrast material administration in breast screening.Keywords: Breast, MR-Diffusion Weighted Imaging, OncologySupplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020.

