Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sampling and analysis techniques for trace volatile organic emissions from consumer products.

C W Bayer1, M S Black, L M Galloway

  • 1Georgia Tech Research Institute, Environmental Monitoring Research Branch, Atlanta 30332.

Journal of Chromatographic Science
|April 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Comparing direct analysis and sorbent collection for volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions reveals differences in trace analysis of consumer products. Direct methods offer speed, while sorbent collection provides comprehensive analysis of VOCs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities.

Annals of dyslexia·2013
Same author

Outdoor air pollution. Asthma and other concerns.

Pediatric clinics of North America·2001
Same author

Sensory irritation in mice exposed to emissions from indoor products.

American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1995
Same author

Effects of selected process parameters on emission rates of volatile organic chemicals from carpet.

American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1992
Same author

Building related illness involving formaldehyde and other volatile organic compounds.

Experimental pathology·1989
Same author

Thermal desorption/gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis of volatile organic compounds in the offices of smokers and nonsmokers.

Biomedical & environmental mass spectrometry·1987

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Environmental Science
  • Consumer Product Safety

Background:

  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted from consumer products, necessitating accurate trace analysis.
  • Traditional methods involve solid sorbent collection followed by off-line analysis.
  • Direct on-line analysis techniques are emerging as potentially faster alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of direct on-line sampling and analysis versus on-line solid sorbent collection for VOC emissions.
  • To evaluate two direct analysis methods: gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with direct injection.
  • To assess the traditional thermal desorption/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TD/GC/MS) method against direct on-line approaches.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Direct injection of environmental chamber emissions into a GC-FID for compound identification.
  • Direct injection of headspace collected emissions into a GC-MS.
  • On-line solid sorbent collection followed by off-line thermal desorption/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TD/GC/MS) analysis.

Main Results:

  • Direct GC-FID analysis allows for rapid compound identification.
  • Direct GC-MS provides sensitive detection of VOCs.
  • TD/GC/MS offers a comprehensive and traditional approach to VOC analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Both direct on-line and sorbent collection methods have distinct advantages for VOC trace analysis.
  • The choice of method depends on the specific analytical requirements for consumer product emissions.
  • Further optimization of direct on-line techniques may enhance their applicability in VOC emission studies.