Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025
07:05
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
6.2K
An ALE Meta-Analysis on Investment Decision-Making.
Elena Ortiz-Teran1,2, Ibai Diez2, Joaquin Lopez-Pascual3
1Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28032 Madrid, Spain.
Brain Sciences
|April 3, 2021
Summary
Investment decisions involve emotions, not just rational analysis. Brain imaging reveals limbic system involvement in reward, risk, and conflict during market choices.
Area of Science:
- Neuroeconomics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision Science
Background:
- Traditional finance theory posits rational investment decision-making.
- Market forecasting often evokes strong emotional responses in investors.
- The neural basis of investment decision-making remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the brain regions involved in investment decision-making.
- To clarify the role of emotions in financial choices using meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- Performed an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis.
- Included functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of investment tasks.
- Analyzed whole-brain data from human subjects.
Main Results:
- Identified significant activation in the ventral striatum, anterior insula, amygdala, and anterior cingulate cortex.
- These brain regions are associated with reward processing, risk assessment, and emotional conflict.
- Findings suggest limbic system involvement in financial decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Investment choices are influenced by emotional processes.
- Neural mechanisms integrate market information with individual beliefs and preferences.
- Neuroeconomic insights challenge purely rational models of financial behavior.
Keywords:
amygdalaanterior cingulate cortexanterior insulainvestorneuroeconomicsrewardriskstockventral striatumMore Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
870
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
12.3K
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
6.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.3K
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.7K
01:20Decision Making
407
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
407
02:01Factorial Design
13.4K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.4K
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
6.6K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.6K
03:26Framing Effects
7.6K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.6K