Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

07:15
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
4.7K
How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System
Aya Ataya1, Won Kim1, Ahmed Elsharkawy1
1Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, School of Integrated Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 3, 2021
Summary
Autonomous vehicle drivers performing non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) prefer input methods based on physical and cognitive load, not just the intervention scenario. Physical load significantly impacts input choice more than cognitive load.
Area of Science:
- Human-computer interaction
- Autonomous systems
- Automotive engineering
Background:
- Autonomous vehicle technology enables drivers to engage in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs).
- Driver-vehicle interaction requires input modalities that align with in-vehicle activities and situational context.
- Previous research overlooked the impact of physical and cognitive load during NDRTs on input acceptance.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate naturalistic interactions in fully autonomous vehicles during NDRTs.
- Evaluate driver acceptance of various input modalities across different intervention scenarios and NDRT engagement levels.
- Develop a decision-making model for natural input preferences in autonomous vehicles.
Main Methods:
- Online methodology with 360 participants evaluating seven natural input interactions (touch, voice, hand gesture, combinations).
- Four NDRTs with varying physical and cognitive engagement levels were presented.
- Six common intervention scenarios were tested, resulting in 24 distinct cases.
Main Results:
- Non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) exert a greater influence on driver input interaction than intervention scenarios.
- Physical load variations have a more significant impact on input selection compared to cognitive load variations.
- Driver preferences for natural inputs were analyzed across different NDRT and intervention conditions.
Conclusions:
- Driver engagement in NDRTs is a primary factor influencing input modality selection in autonomous vehicles.
- Physical demands of NDRTs are more critical than cognitive demands in determining preferred input methods.
- A decision-making model can guide User Experience designers in creating intuitive interfaces for autonomous vehicle drivers.
Keywords:
fully autonomous vehicle (FAV)input interactionsintervene vehicle systemnon-driving related task (NDRT)More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
499
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
499
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
101
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
101

