Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Texture analysis based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging to assess kidney function: a preliminary study
Gumuyang Zhang1, Yan Liu2, Hao Sun1
1Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Background:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated its potential in the evaluation of renal function. Texture analysis (TA) is a novel technique to quantify tissue heterogeneity. We aim to investigate the feasibility of using TA based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as well as T1 and T2 maps to evaluate renal function.
Methods:
Patients with impaired renal function and subjects with a normal renal function who underwent renal diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), as well as T1 and T2 mapping at 3T, were prospectively enrolled. The participants were classified into four groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2): normal (eGFR ≥90), mildly impaired (60≤ eGFR <90), moderately impaired (30≤ eGFR <60), and severely impaired (eGFR <30) renal function groups. Texture features quantified from the renal cortex or medulla were selected to build classifiers to discriminate different renal function groups by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
Results:
In total, 116 candidates were included (94 patients and 22 healthy volunteers, mean age 37.9±14.9 years). There were 46 participants in the normal renal function group, 14 in the mildly impaired renal function group, 27 in the moderately impaired renal function group, and 29 in the severely impaired renal function group. Texture features from the ADC and T1 maps exhibited a good correlation to eGFR. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV to differentiate between the normal and impaired renal function groups were 0.835, 0.792, 0.867, 0.905, and 0.722, respectively; to differentiate between the mildly impaired and moderately impaired groups were 0.937, 0.889, 0.857, 0.923, and 0.800, respectively; and to differentiate between the moderately impaired and severely impaired groups was 0.940, 0.759, 0.889, 0.880, and 0.774, respectively.
Conclusions:
TA based on ADC and T1 maps is feasible for evaluating renal function with relatively good accuracy.
More Related Videos
07:01A Quantitative Detection Method for MicroRNAs in the Kidney of an Ischemic Kidney Injury Mouse Model
Published on: September 11, 2020
07:35Use of Ultra-high Field MRI in Small Rodent Models of Polycystic Kidney Disease for In Vivo Phenotyping and Drug Monitoring
Published on: June 23, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography