Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate01:25

Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate

353
Aggregate shape is classified based on the relative sharpness or roundness of the edges and corners. This classification includes categories like rounded, angular, elongated, and flaky, each with specific characteristics. Rounded aggregates, fully shaped by attrition, are typical of river or seashore gravel, while angular aggregates, such as crushed rock, have well-defined edges. Aggregates that are elongated and flaky are less desirable, as they can reduce the workability and strength of...
353
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.4K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

8.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Point2SSM++: Self-supervised learning of anatomical shape models from point clouds.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

A Pax7::Foxo1 conditional mouse strain.

Skeletal muscle·2026
Same author

Comparison of LGE MRI Scar Identification Methods for Atrial Computational Modeling.

Computing in cardiology·2026
Same author

HAMIL-QA: Hierarchical Approach to Multiple Instance Learning for Atrial LGE MRI Quality Assessment.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2025
Same author

Quantifying Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity: A Machine Learning Approach With CranioRate.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2025
Same author

Talar Morphology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients With Cavovarus Feet.

Foot & ankle international·2025
Same journal

Combined Estimation of Shape and Pose for Statistical Analysis of Articulating Joints.

Shape in Medical Imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4, 2020, Proceedings·2021
Same journal

Patient Specific Classification of Dental Root Canal and Crown Shape.

Shape in Medical Imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4, 2020, Proceedings·2021
Same journal

Interpretation of Brain Morphology in Association to Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Classification Using Graph Convolutional Networks on Triangulated Meshes.

Shape in Medical Imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4, 2020, Proceedings·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.3K

Uncertain-DeepSSM: From Images to Probabilistic Shape Models.

Jadie Adams1,2, Riddhish Bhalodia1,2, Shireen Elhabian1,2

  • 1Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, UT, USA.

Shape in Medical Imaging : International Workshop, Shapemi 2020, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, October 4, 2020, Proceedings
|April 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Uncertain-DeepSSM quantifies shape estimation uncertainty in deep learning models. This approach improves accuracy and trustworthiness for clinical applications, unlike previous overconfident methods.

Keywords:
Bayesian Deep LearningStatistical Shape ModelingUncertainty Quantification

More Related Videos

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.6K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

843

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.3K
A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

9.6K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

843

Area of Science:

  • Medical image analysis
  • Deep learning in medical imaging
  • Statistical shape modeling

Background:

  • Statistical shape modeling (SSM) traditionally requires extensive manual segmentation and registration.
  • Deep learning approaches like DeepSSM automate SSM but often produce overconfident predictions.
  • Quantifying uncertainty is crucial for clinical trust and reliable diagnostic tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a unified model, Uncertain-DeepSSM, for quantifying uncertainty in deep learning-based SSM.
  • To improve the trustworthiness of shape estimations for clinical applications.
  • To enhance the accuracy of SSM while retaining the efficiency of end-to-end deep learning.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed Uncertain-DeepSSM, a unified model integrating aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty quantification.
  • Incorporated data-dependent aleatoric uncertainty by adapting the network to predict input variance.
  • Utilized Monte Carlo dropout sampling for model-dependent epistemic uncertainty estimation.

Main Results:

  • Uncertain-DeepSSM demonstrated improved accuracy compared to the original DeepSSM.
  • The model successfully quantified both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.
  • Maintained the end-to-end nature and minimal pre-processing benefits of DeepSSM.

Conclusions:

  • Uncertain-DeepSSM provides a more trustworthy and accurate approach to statistical shape modeling using deep learning.
  • Quantifying uncertainty is essential for the clinical translation of deep learning-based medical image analysis tools.
  • The proposed method enhances diagnostic reliability by indicating the confidence of shape estimations.