Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

9.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
9.6K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

8.9K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
8.9K
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison01:27

Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

92
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
92
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.4K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.4K
Need for Self-Esteem01:27

Need for Self-Esteem

76
The human need for self-esteem has long intrigued psychologists, leading to the development of several theories that explore its evolutionary and functional significance. Among the most influential are the sociometer, hierometer, and terror management theories. Each offers a unique perspective on why people strive for self-worth and how it shapes behavior and social interaction.Sociometer TheoryAccording to sociometer theory, self-esteem functions as an internal gauge of social acceptance. It...
76

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functions of the environment in behavioral evolution.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

The trianvil test apparatus: measurement of shear strength under pressure.

The Review of scientific instruments·2010
Same author

Analysis of local orientation gradients in deformed single crystals.

Ultramicroscopy·2005
Same author

Changing behavior within session: cyclicity and perseverance produced by varying the minimum ratio of a variable-ratio schedule.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2001
Same author

Prism adaptation to dynamic events.

Perception & psychophysics·1999
Same author

Preference between variable-ratio and fixed-ratio schedules: local and extended relations.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·1996
Same journal

Efficient methods for wave propagation in electron microscopy.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Unsupervised deep image prior for sparse-view and limited-angle electron tomography.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Determination of the structure of the tertiary phase in the alloy Al<sub>10</sub>Mo<sub>10</sub>Nb<sub>10</sub>Ta<sub>10</sub>Ti<sub>30</sub>Zr<sub>30</sub> using convergent beam electron diffraction.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Predictive drift compensation of multi-frame STEM via live scan modification.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Deep PACBED: Multitask analysis of PACBED images using deep neural networks.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Guided progressive reconstructive imaging: A new quantization-based framework for low-dose, high-throughput and real-time analytical ptychography.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

927

Factors affecting Confidence Index in EBSD analysis.

N S De Vincentis1, D P Field2

  • 1Instituto de FĂ­sica Rosario, FCEIA-UNR-CONICET, Bv. 27 de Febrero 210 bis, S2000EZP Rosario, Argentina.

Ultramicroscopy
|April 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article examines how reliable the Confidence Index is for determining the accuracy of crystal orientation measurements in automated electron microscopy. Researchers tested silicon and zinc samples to see if high index scores truly guarantee correct results. They found that a threshold of 0.1 with at least eight detected bands provides a high success rate across different material types.

Keywords:
Confidence IndexEBSDHough bandsOrientationElectron Backscatter DiffractionMicrostructure AnalysisOrientation MappingData Reliability

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.0K
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

927
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.0K
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Materials science and Confidence Index characterization
  • Crystallography and microstructural analysis

Background:

No prior work had fully resolved whether high statistical scores in automated orientation mapping guarantee accurate crystal identification. It was already known that these systems rely on specific metrics to rank potential solutions. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate the relationship between mathematical rankings and physical reality. Prior research has shown that these metrics often prioritize the top-ranked candidate without confirming its absolute validity. This gap motivated a deeper look into how different materials respond to standard automated processing techniques. Scientists have long utilized these automated systems for over twenty years to characterize crystalline structures. Previous studies focused heavily on face-centered cubic materials, leaving other structures less explored. This paper addresses the limitations inherent in relying solely on internal ranking scores for data validation.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors influencing the reliability of the Confidence Index within automated orientation mapping systems. Researchers sought to determine if this statistical metric accurately reflects the physical correctness of crystal orientation measurements. The motivation stems from the observation that high ranking scores do not always guarantee valid results. This uncertainty prompted an investigation into how different materials respond to standard automated processing parameters. The authors specifically addressed the potential for misinterpretation when relying solely on internal voting systems. By testing single crystal silicon and polycrystalline zinc, the team aimed to broaden the understanding of these metrics. They compared their findings with previous research conducted on face-centered cubic materials to establish broader applicability. This work provides a necessary assessment of the limitations and strengths of current automated analysis techniques.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved a systematic evaluation of automated orientation mapping systems using diverse material samples. Researchers selected single crystal silicon and polycrystalline zinc to broaden the scope of existing knowledge. The team performed comparative analyses against data from previous studies focusing on face-centered cubic materials. They assessed the validity of orientation solutions by correlating statistical rankings with physical crystal structures. The investigation utilized standard automated diffraction pattern processing to generate the necessary datasets. Each sample underwent rigorous scanning to ensure a representative distribution of orientations. The authors applied varying thresholds to determine the optimal balance between data quality and accuracy. This methodology allowed for a robust assessment of how different structural parameters influence the final measurement outcomes.

Main Results:

The key findings from the literature demonstrate that approximately 90% of orientation solutions are correct when applying a threshold of 0.1. This performance remains consistent regardless of the specific crystallographic structure or sample orientation. The researchers observed that utilizing at least eight Hough bands is essential for achieving this high level of accuracy. These results were compared against earlier studies that focused on face-centered cubic materials. The data indicates that the reliability of the index is not solely dependent on the material type. Instead, the combination of the index threshold and the number of detected bands dictates the success rate. The study confirms that higher index values do not always equate to a higher probability of correctness. These findings provide a clear benchmark for practitioners seeking to optimize their automated analysis workflows.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that a confidence threshold of 0.1 serves as a reliable benchmark for identifying correct orientation solutions. This metric maintains effectiveness regardless of the underlying crystallographic structure or sample orientation. The researchers suggest that using at least eight Hough bands significantly improves the probability of obtaining accurate data. Their synthesis indicates that approximately 90% of solutions meet accuracy standards under these specific conditions. These findings imply that users should prioritize these parameters during automated data acquisition processes. The study highlights that internal ranking scores do not inherently guarantee the physical correctness of a measured orientation. The authors emphasize that their results align with previous investigations conducted on different material classes. This work provides a practical framework for improving the reliability of automated microstructural characterization workflows.

The researchers propose that a Confidence Index of 0.1, when paired with at least eight Hough bands, yields correct orientation solutions approximately 90% of the time. This threshold functions consistently across diverse crystallographic structures, including single crystal silicon and polycrystalline zinc.

The Confidence Index acts as a statistical metric that identifies if one orientation solution receives more votes than competing candidates. However, the authors note that this ranking does not inherently confirm that the selected orientation matches the actual physical crystal structure.

The authors utilized single crystal silicon and polycrystalline zinc to test their hypotheses. These materials were chosen to determine if the reliability of the index remains stable across different crystal systems, specifically comparing these results to prior studies on face-centered cubic materials.

Hough bands represent the primary data features extracted from diffraction patterns. The researchers demonstrate that capturing at least eight of these bands is a prerequisite for achieving the 90% accuracy rate observed in their experimental trials.

The study measured the correctness of orientation solutions by comparing automated outputs against known crystal structures. This phenomenon reveals that while statistical rankings are useful, they require specific thresholding to minimize errors in microstructural mapping.

The authors imply that relying exclusively on automated ranking scores without defined thresholds can lead to misinterpretation of microstructural data. They suggest that establishing standardized parameters is vital for ensuring the integrity of results in materials characterization.