Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Lung cancer risk and effective dose coefficients for radon: UNSCEAR review and ICRP conclusions
J D Harrison1,2
1Oxford Brookes University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford OX3 0BP, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) has provided a detailed and authoritative update of its reviews of the epidemiology and dosimetry of radon and progeny. Lifetime risk of lung cancer calculated using data for several miner cohorts were 2.4-7.5 × 10-4per working level month (WLM) of radon-222 progeny exposure for a mixed male/female population and 3.0-9.6 × 10-4per WLM for a male population. Dosimetric models gave mean values of effective dose coefficients from radon-222 progeny of 12 mSv per WLM for mines, 16 mSv per WLM for indoor workplaces and 11 mSv per WLM for homes. The lifetime risk coefficient used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is 5 × 10-4per WLM and it has recently recommended an effective dose coefficient for radon-222 and progeny of 3 mSv per mJ h m-3(about 10 mSv per WLM) for most circumstances of exposure. The ICRP risk and dose coefficients are supported by the UNSCEAR review and provide a clear and firm basis for current international advice and standards for protection from radon. Notwithstanding this evidence and the ICRP advice, UNSCEAR will continue to use a lower value of effective dose coefficient of 5.7 mSv per WLM for assessments of population exposures.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Relative Risk
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

