Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

358
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
358
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

538
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
538
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

818
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
818
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

559
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
559
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

273
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
273
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

275
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
275

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Category learning difficulties in ADHD across modalities and multiple learning systems.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Computational markers show specific deficits for dyslexia and ADHD in complex learning settings.

NPJ science of learning·2025
Same author

Procedural auditory category learning is selectively disrupted in developmental language disorder.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Intact Utilization of Contextual Information in Speech Categorization in Autism.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2023
Same author

Internal Cognitive Load Differentially Influences Acoustic and Lexical Context Effects in Speech Perception: Evidence From a Population With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2023
Same author

Memory for incidentally learned categories evolves in the post-learning interval.

eLife·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.5K

Atypical Reinforcement Learning in Developmental Dyslexia.

Atheer Odah Massarwe1, Noyli Nissan1, Yafit Gabay1

  • 1Department of Special Education, Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS
|April 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals with developmental dyslexia show poorer reinforcement learning (RL) of contingencies compared to neurotypicals. However, their ability to generalize learned information in new combinations remains intact.

Keywords:
Developmental dyslexiaImplicit transitive inference taskProbabilistic selection taskProcedural learningReinforcement learningTransfer

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.0K
An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.5K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.0K
An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Disorders

Background:

  • The Procedural Deficit Hypothesis links corticostriatal pathway abnormalities to language deficits in developmental dyslexia.
  • Corticostriatal pathways are crucial for reinforcement learning (RL), involving learning contingencies through trial and error.
  • This suggests a potential link between dyslexia and impaired RL.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals with developmental dyslexia exhibit deficits in reinforcement learning (RL) compared to neurotypical individuals.
  • To examine RL abilities in two distinct tasks assessing the learning of reinforcement contingencies.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed a probabilistic selection task requiring learning of reinforcement contingencies from probabilistic feedback.
  • Participants also undertook an implicit transitive inference task, learning hierarchical relations from deterministic feedback based on reinforcement histories.
  • Performance was compared between individuals with developmental dyslexia and neurotypical controls.

Main Results:

  • Learning of reinforcement contingencies was significantly poorer in the developmental dyslexia group compared to the neurotypical group.
  • No significant differences were found between groups in the ability to learn from positive or negative feedback.
  • Dyslexic individuals demonstrated comparable performance to neurotypicals when applying learned information to novel combinations of previously presented stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals with developmental dyslexia exhibit less robust learning of reinforcement contingencies.
  • The findings suggest specific impairments in RL contingency learning in developmental dyslexia, distinct from general feedback processing.
  • Further research is warranted to elucidate the neuro-cognitive mechanisms underlying these RL deficits in developmental dyslexia.