Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...

Determination of Expected Frequency

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Modelling non-linear personality change surrounding transitions: A review of statistical approaches.

European journal of personality·2026

Same author

Bayes factor hypothesis testing in meta-analyses: Practical advantages and methodological considerations.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same author

Rigid control of motor unit firing rates in the human tibialis anterior muscle persists during neurofeedback.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026

Same author

To vary or not to vary: A flexible empirical Bayes factor for testing variance components.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026

Same author

Assessing mobile instant messenger networks with donated data.

Social network analysis and mining·2026

Same author

A tutorial on Bayesian hypothesis testing of correlation coefficients using the BFpack-module in JASP.

Behavior research methods·2025

Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Bayesian Testing of Scientific Expectations under Multivariate Normal Linear Models.

Joris Mulder¹, Xin Gu²

¹Tilburg University.

Multivariate Behavioral Research

|April 8, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a default Bayes factor for model selection in multivariate normal linear models with parameter constraints. The method, using fractional Bayes methodology, offers a robust statistical criterion for applied research.

Keywords:

Default Bayes factors fractional prior missing data multiple constrained hypothesis test multivariate normal linear models

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

Statistics
Statistical Inference
Multivariate Analysis

Background:

The multivariate normal linear model is fundamental in applied statistical research.
Existing model selection criteria are limited for problems with equality or order constraints on parameters.
Applications span multivariate t-testing, MANCOVA, regression, and repeated measures analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a novel default Bayes factor for model selection in multivariate normal linear models.
To address limitations in statistical criteria for models with parameter constraints.
To provide a method for evaluating models based on scientific expectations.

Main Methods:

Utilizes fractional Bayes methodology for constructing the Bayes factor.
Employs group-specific fractions to manage prior information effectively.
Centers the fractional prior on the boundary of the constrained space for accurate evaluation of order-constrained models.

Main Results:

The proposed Bayes factor is suitable for model selection problems with equality and order constraints.
The methodology demonstrates important properties across various testing scenarios.
The approach is implemented and accessible through the R package 'BFpack'.

Conclusions:

A new, robust Bayes factor is available for complex multivariate model selection.
The fractional Bayes approach effectively handles prior information and parameter constraints.
The method is practical for researchers in social and medical sciences, supported by real-world applications.