Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Published on: March 25, 2022
Pancreatobiliary Diseases: Evaluation by Transabdominal and Endoscopic Ultrasound
1Professor Dr Bimal Chandra Shil, Professor & Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital (SSMC&MH), Dhaka, Bangladesh;
Abstract:
Pancreaticobiliary diseases are the important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Among the imaging modalities, Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) is cheap, available, and noninvasive but it has some limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is invasive but it has some diagnostic and therapeutic advantages over TUS. This study was aimed to see the diagnostic yields of EUS and TUS in the pancreatobiliary diseases. This cross sectional study was conducted in Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital (SSMC&MH), Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2017 to February 2019. All (n=222) patients were evaluated clinically and with relevant investigations. TUS and EUS were done in all patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was done in 60 patients. Among 222 patients 56.8% were males; mean age was 46±16 years; the main presenting symptoms were abdominal pain and jaundice. In diseases of biliary tree, EUS showed dilated CBD alone or in combination with stone in 50 and 67 cases and TUS showed 37, 63 patients respectively. The difference between the findings of EUS and TUS was statistically significant (p=0.00). In gall bladder, EUS found microlithiasis in 6(2.6%) and sludges in 24(10.8%) cases whereas TUS found microlithiasis in 1(0.5%) and sludges in 17(7.7%) cases respectively (p=0.00). Both EUS and TUS detected cholelithiasis in equal number of patients 46(20.3%). On pancreatic evaluation, EUS and TUS detected pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities in 24(10.8%) and 12(5.5%) patients respectively with significant p value (0.00). In cases of pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma the difference between the findings of EUS and TUS were statistically significant (p<0.05). EUS detected 7 cases of ampullary/peri-ampullary neoplasms whereas TUS detected only 2 cases. The sensitivity of EUS for detecting CBD dilatation, CBD stones, CBD SOL and pancreatic SOL was 85%, 91%, 93%, and 92% respectively. The sensitivity of TUS for detecting CBD dilatation, CBD stones, CBD SOL and pancreatic SOL was 42%, 52%, 40%, and 37% respectively. EUS is more sensitive than TUS in diagnosing pancreaticobiliary disorders. It is of paramount importance in patients in diagnosing CBD dilatation, choledocholithiasis, biliary microlithiasis and pancreaticobiliary neoplasm. EUS has important role before proceeding to further management by more invasive techniques like ERCP or surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
