Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Anterior HR-OCT as a Non-Invasive Tool for Characterizing Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
Published on: August 9, 2024
Subsolid Lesions Exceeding 3 Centimeters: The Ground-Glass Opacity Component Still Matters.
Fanfan Fan1, Yang Zhang1, Fangqiu Fu1
1Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
For lung adenocarcinoma larger than 3 cm, the presence of a ground-glass opacity (GGO) component indicates a better prognosis than solid nodules. This finding suggests incorporating GGO into clinical T classification for improved lung cancer prediction.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Oncology
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Previous studies on ground-glass opacities (GGO) and lung adenocarcinoma prognosis were limited to small tumors (≤3 cm).
- The prognostic value of GGO in larger subsolid lesions (>3 cm) compared to solid nodules remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if the GGO component in subsolid lung adenocarcinoma lesions exceeding 3 cm predicts a better prognosis than solid nodules within the same clinical T category.
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of GGO in large lung adenocarcinoma.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 1010 patients with completely resected clinical N0 lung adenocarcinoma (2010-2015) was analyzed, including 860 solid and 150 subsolid lesions >3 cm.
- Propensity score matching, adjusting for solid component size, was employed to compare prognostic outcomes between GGO and solid lesion groups.
- 144 matched pairs of patients were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The GGO group demonstrated significantly better overall survival (P=.011) and recurrence-free survival (P=.003) compared to the solid group after propensity score matching.
- These survival benefits were consistent in patients with solid-predominant lesions and across different clinical T categories.
- No significant difference in the size of the solid component was observed between the GGO and solid groups (mean 23.7 mm vs 24.4 mm, P=.450).
Conclusions:
- Lung adenocarcinoma with a GGO component exceeding 3 cm offers a better prognosis than solid nodules of similar size within the same clinical T category.
- Incorporating the GGO component into the clinical T classification system may enhance prognostic accuracy for lung cancers larger than 3 cm.

