Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump
Published on: June 1, 2022
Simplifying Johanson's roller compaction model to build a "Virtual Roller Compactor" as a predictive tool - Theory
Chi So1, Lap Y Leung1, Ariel R Muliadi1
1Small Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, United States.
Abstract:
The purpose of the study is to build a "virtual roller compactor" as a predictive tool to assess the roll force (RF)-maximum pressure (Pmax) and RF-ribbon density relationship for pharmaceutical roller compaction. We provided a theoretical basis to demonstrate that, there exists a critical nip angle for a pharmaceutical powder, beyond which the RF-Pmax relationship is insensitive to wall friction angle or effective angle of internal friction. We showed that for most pharmaceutical roller compaction, the critical nip angle is lower than 17 degree, and can be exceeded via wall friction elevation, using rolls with non-smooth surface. Under this condition, the original Johanson model can be substantially simplified to a single equation requiring only one material property (compressibility). By performing manufacturing-scale roller compaction using materials with diverse compressibility, we showed that the simplified, friction angle-free model performed similar to the original Johanson model. It can predict the RF-Pmax and RF-ribbon density relationship well after applying a correction factor. The predictive tool, in the form of a user-friendly graphical user interface, was created based on the simplified model. The tool was adopted for in-house, bench-scale formulation development and scale-up because of its ease-of-use, good predicting capability, and very low material demand.
Related Concept Videos
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...
Rolling Resistance
For instance, imagine a hard cylinder rolling on a comparatively soft surface. The cylinder's weight compresses the surface beneath it. As the cylinder moves, the material in front of it slows down due to...
Virtual Work for a System of Connected Rigid Bodies
Next,...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability

