Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Cost-efficient clinical studies with continuous time survival outcomes
Grecio J Sandoval1, Ionut Bebu1, John M Lachin1
1The Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, The George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Insights
Designing clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes can be costly. This study introduces a framework for cost-efficient clinical trial design, optimizing power while minimizing expected total study costs for better resource allocation.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trial Design
- Biostatistics
- Health Economics
Background:
- Time-to-event outcomes are crucial in clinical studies, particularly in cardiovascular trials.
- High costs associated with lengthy clinical trials pose significant obstacles.
- Existing trial design methods often overlook cost considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a general framework for designing cost-efficient clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes.
- To identify optimal designs that minimize expected total study costs for a given power and type-I error level.
- To provide a practical tool for researchers to optimize trial resource allocation.
Main Methods:
- Developed a general framework applicable to Cox proportional hazards and Aalen additive models.
- Incorporated various recruitment and censoring assumptions.
- Illustrated the approach using a Weibull time-to-event outcome with uniform recruitment and exponential censoring.
- Described the application for an additive hazards model.
Main Results:
- The proposed framework enables the selection of cost-efficient designs that achieve desired statistical power.
- Identified that various combinations of participants, enrollment, follow-up times, and allocation probabilities can yield the same power.
- The optimal design minimizes expected total study costs.
Conclusions:
- A novel framework for cost-efficient clinical trial design with time-to-event outcomes has been presented.
- The method allows for the optimization of study resources by minimizing expected costs while maintaining statistical rigor.
- A Shiny web application is available for implementing the proposed methods.
Abstract:
Time-to-event outcomes are common in clinical studies. For example, the time to a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, defined as CVD death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke) is a commonly used outcome in cardiovascular outcome trials. Owing to the lengthy time frame and other factors, the high costs of conducting such studies has been identified as one of the major obstacles in conducting clinical trials in the United States. However, typical approaches for designing clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes do not consider study costs. For a given effect size (eg, hazard ratio), the power to detect differences between two groups is typically a function of the total number of events observed in the study. Therefore, the same level of power will be achieved based on various combinations of the total number of participants, length of enrollment and total follow-up times, and group allocation probability. Herein, we provide a general framework for designing cost-efficient studies comparing treatments with respect to continuous time-to-event outcomes. Among the various designs that achieve the desired level of power to detect a given effect size for a fixed type-I error level, the optimal cost-efficient design is the design that minimizes the expected total study cost. The method is general and can be used for Cox proportional hazards models or Aalen additive models, and under various recruitment and censoring assumptions. The proposed approach for designing cost-efficient studies is illustrated for a Weibull time-to-event outcome with uniform recruitment and exponentially distributed censoring time. The case of an additive hazards model is also described. A Shiny web application implementation of the proposed methods is presented.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

