Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
Designing QSARs for Parameters of High-Throughput Toxicokinetic Models Using Open-Source Descriptors
Daniel E Dawson1, Brandall L Ingle2, Katherine A Phillips1
1Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
New in silico models predict chemical clearance and unbound fraction, aiding toxicokinetic assessments. These models accurately prioritize chemical risks, even without extensive in vitro data.
Area of Science:
- Environmental chemistry
- Computational toxicology
- Pharmacokinetics
Background:
- Intrinsic metabolic clearance (Clint) and unbound fraction (fup) are crucial for toxicokinetic (TK) models.
- Experimental data for Clint and fup are scarce for many chemicals.
- High-throughput screening requires reliable in silico prediction methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop open-source quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for Clint and fup.
- Provide reliable in silico predictions for diverse chemical classes.
- Evaluate the utility of these QSAR models in risk-based prioritization.
Main Methods:
- Developed open-source QSAR models for Clint and fup.
- Utilized model predictions as inputs for TK component of risk-based prioritization (Bioactivity/Exposure Ratios - BERs).
- Applied models to a subset of the Tox21 screening library (6484 chemicals).
Main Results:
- In silico predictions yielded similar proportions of chemicals with BER < 1 as in vitro data (17.5%).
- High concordance (90.4%) was observed between in silico and in vitro parameters for classifying chemicals with BER < 1 or > 1.
- QSAR models demonstrated suitability for prioritizing chemicals lacking in vitro TK data.
Conclusions:
- Open-source QSAR models for Clint and fup offer reliable in silico predictions.
- These models can effectively support risk-based chemical prioritization strategies.
- The developed QSARs are valuable tools for assessing chemicals with limited experimental toxicokinetic data.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...