Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gender differences in real-world hearing protector attenuation.

S M Abel1, P W Alberti, D Rokas

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

The Journal of Otolaryngology
|April 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hearing loss in the elderly: the hidden handicap.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

Sound source identification with ANR earmuffs.

Noise & health·2005
Same author

The effects of background noise on cognitive performance during a 70 hour simulation of conditions aboard the International Space Station.

Noise & health·2004
Same author

The effect of the audallion BEAMformer noise reduction preprocessor on sound localization for cochlear implant users.

Ear and hearing·2002
Same author

An improved instrument mounting arm.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2001
Same author

Successful treatment of juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis-related multicystic lung disease with cidofovir: case report and review of the literature.

Chest·2000
Same journal

Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the submandibular gland: unique presentation and surprising treatment response.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Hearing recovery after meningitis.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Endoscopic transnasal sphenopalatine arterial ligation for intractable posterior epistaxis in a young child.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

[Non-functional parathyroid cyst].

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Cacosmia secondary to an olfactory groove meningioma.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
Same journal

Hemangioma of the vocal cords: review of two cases.

The Journal of otolaryngology·2008
See all related articles

Female hearing protection may be less effective than male hearing protection, especially with single-size devices. This study highlights potential gender disparities in real-world noise reduction effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Occupational Health
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Effective hearing protection is crucial for preventing noise-induced hearing loss in various occupational and recreational settings.
  • Previous research has not conclusively determined if gender influences the real-world attenuation provided by hearing protection devices (HPDs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential gender-based differences in the real-world effectiveness of four different types of hearing protection devices.
  • To compare achieved attenuation levels with manufacturer specifications and identify factors contributing to performance variations.

Main Methods:

  • 160 subjects (80 males, 80 females) with normal hearing under 45 years old were tested.
  • Four types of HPDs were evaluated: E-A-R foam plug, Willson Sound Silencer, Bilsom Soft, and MSA Ear Defender.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Binaural headphone detection thresholds were measured in quiet across multiple octave bands (250-6300 Hz) with and without HPDs.

    • Main Results:

    • Females generally achieved lower attenuation scores than males when using single-size HPDs.
    • For two insert protectors, mean attenuation fell significantly below manufacturer specifications (up to 18 dB at certain frequencies).
    • Variations in scores were not explained by subject hearing thresholds or, for multi-size devices, by plug fit.

    Conclusions:

    • Gender may be a factor influencing the real-world effectiveness of certain hearing protection devices, particularly those available in a single size.
    • Discrepancies between achieved and specified attenuation highlight potential issues with HPD performance and manufacturer claims.
    • Further research is needed to understand and address gender-specific fitting and performance issues in hearing protection.