Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Between-center variation in high-priority listing status under the new heart allocation policy
Gege Ran1, Kevin Chung1, Allen S Anderson2
1Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Insights
The new US heart transplant policy led to more patients with mechanical support devices being listed at high priority. This practice change was widespread across most transplant centers, potentially impacting the policy's effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplant Surgery
- Health Policy
Background:
- The revised US heart allocation policy aimed to optimize organ distribution.
- An increase in high-priority listings for patients with mechanical circulatory support devices was observed post-policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if the rise in high-priority listings was widespread or concentrated among specific transplant centers.
- To analyze changes in transplant center practices following the new heart allocation policy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.
- Employed mixed-effect logistic regression to compare pre-policy and post-policy adult heart-alone transplant candidate listings.
- Analyzed listings from December 2016 to February 2018 (pre-policy) and December 2018 to February 2020 (post-policy).
Main Results:
- Nearly all US transplant centers (94.8%) listed more candidates at high-priority status post-policy.
- The proportion of high-priority listings increased significantly from 7.0% to 25.5% (p < .001).
- Centers in Organ Procurement Organizations with higher pre-policy Status 1A transplant rates were more likely to use high-priority status.
Conclusions:
- The new heart allocation policy prompted widespread and variable changes in transplant center listing practices.
- These practice shifts may potentially undermine the intended effectiveness of the new heart allocation system.
- Further evaluation is needed to understand the long-term impact on organ allocation and patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Under the new US heart allocation policy, transplant centers listed significantly more candidates at high priority statuses (Status 1 and 2) with mechanical circulatory support devices than expected. We determined whether the practice change was widespread or concentrated among certain transplant centers. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we used mixed-effect logistic regression to compare the observed listings of adult, heart-alone transplant candidates post-policy (December 2018 to February 2020) to seasonally matched pre-policy cohort (December 2016 to February 2018). US transplant centers (N = 96) listed similar number of candidates in each policy period (4472 vs. 4498) but listed significantly more at high priority status (25.5% vs. 7.0%, p < .001) than expected. Adjusted for candidate characteristics, 91 of 96 (94.8%) centers listed significantly more candidates at high-priority status than expected, with the unexpected increase varying from 4.8% to 50.4% (interquartile range [IQR]: 14.0%-23.3%). Centers in OPOs with highest Status 1A transplant rate pre-policy were significantly more likely to utilize high-priority status under the new policy (OR: 9.73, p = .01). The new heart allocation policy was associated with widespread and significantly variable changes in transplant center practice that may undermine the effectiveness of the new system.
Related Concept Videos
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

