An improved direct metamobilome approach increases the detection of larger-sized circular elements across kingdoms

Katrine Wacenius Skov Alanin1, Tue Sparholt Jørgensen2, Patrick Denis Browne1

  • 1Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Plasmid
|April 19, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Multiple displacement amplification (MDA) hinders the detection of large plasmids in prokaryotic metamobilome studies. Omitting MDA is recommended for accurate analysis of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and their impact on microbial genomes.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Mobile genetic elements (MGEs), including plasmids and bacteriophages, drive prokaryotic genome evolution and plasticity.
  • MGEs contribute to the spread of critical traits like antibiotic resistance and virulence, posing risks to human health.
  • Metamobilomics, the study of environmental circular MGEs, offers insights into MGE mobility, prevalence, and genetic content.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) on the detection of circular MGEs in metamobilome datasets.
  • To systematically evaluate the bias introduced by MDA towards smaller circular elements.
  • To determine if MDA can be omitted in library preparation for accurate MGE detection.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of paired metamobilome datasets generated with and without MDA.
  • Analysis of the relationship between sequencing coverage and the size of circular MGEs.
  • Evaluation of library preparation kits, including those using enzyme-based DNA fragmentation (e.g., Nextera XT®).

Main Results:

  • MDA significantly biases metamobilomics towards smaller circular MGEs, leading to the loss of larger circular elements.
  • This study provides the first systematic evidence that MDA is detrimental to detecting large plasmids in the presence of small plasmids.
  • MDA can be omitted when employing enzyme-based DNA fragmentation and PCR in library preparation kits.

Conclusions:

  • MDA introduces a critical bias in metamobilomics, underrepresenting larger plasmids and potentially skewing our understanding of MGE dynamics.
  • Researchers should consider omitting MDA in library preparation protocols, especially when using enzyme-based fragmentation, to improve the detection of diverse MGEs.
  • Avoiding MDA is crucial for a more comprehensive analysis of MGEs, their role in microbial adaptation, and their implications for public health.