Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Responses to Heat and Cold Stress02:45

Responses to Heat and Cold Stress

14.1K
Every organism has an optimum temperature range within which healthy growth and physiological functioning can occur. At the ends of this range, there will be a minimum and maximum temperature that interrupt biological processes.
14.1K
Responses to Salt Stress02:02

Responses to Salt Stress

13.7K
Salt stress—which can be triggered by high salt concentrations in a plant’s environment—can significantly affect plant growth and crop production by influencing photosynthesis and the absorption of water and nutrients.
13.7K
Responses to Drought and Flooding02:41

Responses to Drought and Flooding

11.4K
Water plays a significant role in the life cycle of plants. However, insufficient or excess of water can be detrimental and pose a serious threat to plants.
11.4K
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata02:04

Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata

29.8K
During photosynthesis, plants acquire the necessary carbon dioxide and release the produced oxygen back into the atmosphere. Openings in the epidermis of plant leaves is the site of this exchange of gasses. A single opening is called a stoma—derived from the Greek word for “mouth.” Stomata open and close in response to a variety of environmental cues.
29.8K
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss01:57

Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

27.1K
Though evaporation from plant leaves drives transpiration, it also results in loss of water. Because water is critical for photosynthetic reactions and other cellular processes, evolutionary pressures on plants in different environments have driven the acquisition of adaptations that reduce water loss.
27.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A hypervariable intron of the <i>STAYGREEN</i> locus provides excellent discrimination among <i>Pisum fulvum</i> accessions and reveals evidence for a relatively recent hybridization event with <i>Pisum sativum</i>.

Frontiers in plant science·2023
Same author

Early production of table olives at a mid-7th millennium BP submerged site off the Carmel coast (Israel).

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Distinguishing between Bread Wheat and Spelt Grains Using Molecular Markers and Spectroscopy.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2019
Same author

Prevalence, Development, and Significance of Ascochyta Blight Caused by Peyronellaea pinodes in Pisum elatius Populations Growing in Natural Ecosystems.

Phytopathology·2016
Same author

The Temperature Response and Aggressiveness of Peyronellaea pinodes Isolates Originating from Wild and Domesticated Pisum sp. in Israel.

Phytopathology·2016
Same author

Evidence of polar auxin flow in 375 million-year-old fossil wood.

American journal of botany·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Dry Root Rot Disease Assays in Chickpea: a Detailed Methodology
06:58

Dry Root Rot Disease Assays in Chickpea: a Detailed Methodology

Published on: January 17, 2021

7.8K

Vernalization response of wild chickpea.

S Abbo1, S Lev-Yadun2, N Galwey3

  • 1The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

The New Phytologist
|April 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) evolved reduced sensitivity to cold temperatures, unlike its wild progenitor. This adaptation facilitated its shift to spring sowing and wider geographic spread.

Keywords:
Cicer sp.chickpeacrop evolutionlow-temperature response locisummer croppingvernalization

More Related Videos

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

10.7K
Composition and Properties of Aquafaba: Water Recovered from Commercially Canned Chickpeas
10:35

Composition and Properties of Aquafaba: Water Recovered from Commercially Canned Chickpeas

Published on: February 10, 2018

34.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Dry Root Rot Disease Assays in Chickpea: a Detailed Methodology
06:58

Dry Root Rot Disease Assays in Chickpea: a Detailed Methodology

Published on: January 17, 2021

7.8K
Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

10.7K
Composition and Properties of Aquafaba: Water Recovered from Commercially Canned Chickpeas
10:35

Composition and Properties of Aquafaba: Water Recovered from Commercially Canned Chickpeas

Published on: February 10, 2018

34.1K

Area of Science:

  • Plant genetics
  • Crop evolution
  • Agronomy

Background:

  • Understanding the domestication of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) is crucial for crop improvement.
  • Investigating the response to low temperatures during early growth reveals evolutionary adaptations.
  • Wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum) serves as a key progenitor for studying domestication processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the response to low temperature during early growth in cultivated chickpea and its wild progenitor.
  • To clarify the evolutionary processes of chickpea under domestication, focusing on cold response.
  • To assess the genetic variation in low-temperature response within chickpea progeny.

Main Methods:

  • Exposure of parental lines and F2/F3 progeny of chickpea to cold treatment (4°C for 30 days) versus control conditions.
  • Comparison of flowering time and apical dominance between wild and cultivated chickpea under cold stress.
  • Analysis of genetic variation in flowering time response to low temperature in F3 progeny.

Main Results:

  • Cold treatment advanced flowering by 19 days in wild chickpea but only 3 days in cultivated chickpea.
  • Low temperature promoted apical dominance in wild chickpea, while it was constitutive in cultivated chickpea.
  • Significant genetic variation in flowering time response to low temperature was observed in F3 progeny.

Conclusions:

  • Selection against vernalization requirement alleles was a key step in chickpea evolution.
  • Reduced low-temperature response enabled chickpea's transition to a spring-sown crop and its spread to new regions.
  • Introgression with wild chickpea risks reintroducing cold-sensitive alleles, potentially impacting yield and stress resistance.