Related Experiment Videos
Associations Between Muscle Quality and Cognitive Function in Older Men: Cross-Sectional Data From the Geelong
Sophia X Sui1, Lana J Williams1, Kara L Holloway-Kew1
1Deakin University, IMPACT (Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Geelong, Victoria, Australia; University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
Sarcopenia-related declines appear to be adversely associated with cognition in the elderly. Poor muscle quality is a marker for sarcopenia, yet little research has examined the concurrence of poor muscle quality and poor cognition. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between muscle quality and cognitive function, overall and in specific domains, in older men. This study involved 342 men from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (ages 60-96 years). Handgrip strength (HGS, kg) was measured by dynamometry (Vernier, LoggerPro3), and lean mass of arms (kg) and appendicular lean mass (ALM, kg) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Lunar). Muscle quality was expressed as HGS/(arm lean mass) (kg/kg) as well as HGS/ALM (kg/kg). Cognitive function was assessed in 4 domains: visual attention, psychomotor function, working memory and visual learning. Overall cognitive function scores were calculated. Higher scores represent poorer cognitive performance in attention, psychomotor function and working memory, but better performance for visual memory/learning and overall cognitive function. Additionally, cognitive impairment was determined by the mini-mental state exam (score ≤ 24). Linear regression analyses and logistic regression were performed. There were age-related declines observed for all measures relating to muscle and cognition. Muscle quality (HGS/arm lean mass) was associated with all cognition assessments before and after adjusting for age, except for age-adjusted working memory. Muscle quality (HGS/arm lean mass) was associated with psychomotor function (B -0.01, 95% CI -0.02, -0.005) and overall cognitive function (b + 0.07, 95% CI 0.03, 0.11) after adjusting for age and education. Greater muscle quality was also associated with the likelihood of cognitive impairment OR 0.64 (95%CI 0.46-0.88) after adjusting for age; associations with attention and visual memory/learning were attenuated after further adjustment for confounders. Similar patterns were observed when muscle quality was determined as HGS/ALM. Our data support an association between muscle quality and cognitive function. Further research is needed to examine temporal changes between the Two.