Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
Published on: December 31, 2013
Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution
Yoshiyuki Suzuki1, Naotsugu Kaneko2, Atsushi Sasaki2
1Graduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan.
Abstract:
Corticospinal excitability in humans can be facilitated during imagination and/or observation of upper-limb motor tasks. However, it remains unclear to what extent facilitation levels may differ from those elicited during execution of the same tasks. Twelve able-bodied individuals were recruited in this study. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles were elicited through transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex during: (i) rest; (ii) wrist extension; and (iii) wrist flexion. Responses were compared between: (1) motor imagery combined with virtual action observation (MI + AO; first-person virtual wrist movements shown on a computer display, while participants remained at rest and imagined these movements); and (2) motor execution (ME; participants extended or flexed their wrist). During MI + AO, ECR MEPs were facilitated during the extension phase but not the flexion phase, while FCR MEPs were facilitated during the flexion phase but not extension phase, compared to rest. During the ME condition, same, but greater, modulations were shown as those during MI + AO, while background muscle activities were similar in the rest phase as during extension and flexion phase in the MI + AO condition. Our results demonstrated that kinesthetic MI that included imagination and observation of virtual hands can elicit phase-dependent muscles-specific corticospinal facilitation of wrist muscles, consistent to those during actual hand extension and flexion. Moreover, we showed that MI + AO can contribute considerably to the overall corticospinal facilitation (∼20 % of ME) even without muscle contractions. These findings support utility of computer graphics-based motor imagery, which may have implications for rehabilitation and development of brain-computer interfaces.
More Related Videos
08:09Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality
Published on: September 3, 2015
08:48Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
Published on: January 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Coordination and Action
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
Generation of Action Potential in Skeletal Muscles
Like neurons, muscle cells are also regarded as excitable due to their capacity to change in response to stimuli, primarily due to voltage-gated ion channels embedded in their plasma membranes, which get activated by alterations in the...