Science fiction authors' perspectives on human genetic engineering.

Area of Science:

• Bioethics and Science Fiction Studies
• Societal Implications of Genetic Engineering

Background:

• The human gene editing debate frequently references science fiction but rarely involves science fiction authors as stakeholders.
• Understanding the perspectives of creators who shape public imagination is crucial for comprehensive ethical discussions.

Purpose of the Study:

• To investigate how science fiction authors develop and disseminate their views on human gene editing.
• To identify key ethical issues and fictional influences shaping authors' perceptions of genetic engineering.

Main Methods:

• An online questionnaire was administered to 78 science fiction authors, 71 of whom had prior experience writing about genetic engineering.
• Analysis of responses regarding ethical themes for exploration and influential fictional works.

Main Results:

• Authors most frequently suggested exploring gene editing's affordability, potential for new social divisions, consent issues, and safety risks.
• Psychological effects and religious objections were less frequently cited as topics for exploration.
• Influential works included Gattaca, Star Trek, The Island of Doctor Moreau, and Brave New World; Frankenstein was rarely cited.

Conclusions:

• Science fiction authors offer distinct perspectives on gene editing ethics compared to bioethicists and the general public.
• Engaging the science fiction community can enrich the gene editing debate for both proponents and opponents.
• Specific fictional works identified by authors can serve as valuable references for ongoing discussions.