Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Personalised randomised controlled trial designs-a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant
A Sarah Walker1, Ian R White2, Rebecca M Turner2
1MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract:
Antimicrobial resistance is impacting treatment decisions for, and patient outcomes from, bacterial infections worldwide, with particular threats from infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumanii, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Numerous areas of clinical uncertainty surround the treatment of these highly resistant infections, yet substantial obstacles exist to the design and conduct of treatment trials for carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections. These include the lack of a widely acceptable optimised standard of care and control regimens, varying antimicrobial susceptibilities and clinical contraindications making specific intervention regimens infeasible, and diagnostic and recruitment challenges. The current single comparator trials are not designed to answer the urgent public health question, identified as a high priority by WHO, of what are the best regimens out of the available options that will significantly reduce morbidity, costs, and mortality. This scenario has an analogy in network meta-analysis, which compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis to rank the best of a set of available treatments. To address these obstacles, we propose extending the network meta-analysis approach to individual randomisation of patients. We refer to this approach as a Personalised RAndomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design that compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis, to identify, overall, which is the best treatment out of a set of available treatments to recommend, or how these different treatments rank against each other. In this Personal View, we summarise the design principles of personalised randomised controlled trial designs. Specifically, of a network of different potential regimens for life-threatening carbapenem-resistant infections, each patient would be randomly assigned only to regimens considered clinically reasonable for that patient at that time, incorporating antimicrobial susceptibility, toxicity profile, pharmacometric properties, availability, and physician assessment. Analysis can use both direct and indirect comparisons across the network, analogous to network meta-analysis. This new trial design will maximise the relevance of the findings to each individual patient, and enable the top-ranked regimens from any personalised randomisation list to be identified, in terms of both efficacy and safety.
Insights
Antimicrobial resistance poses global treatment challenges. A new Personalised Randomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design addresses this by comparing multiple treatment regimens for carbapenem-resistant infections, aiming to identify optimal patient-specific therapies.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health threat, particularly from carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumanii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- Clinical trials for highly resistant infections face significant obstacles, including lack of standard care, regimen variability, and recruitment challenges.
- Current trial designs are insufficient to determine the best available treatment regimens to reduce morbidity, costs, and mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and describe a novel clinical trial design, the Personalised RAndomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical), to address the limitations of current trial methodologies for antimicrobial resistance.
- To outline how the PRACTical design can effectively compare multiple treatment regimens for life-threatening infections.
Main Methods:
- The PRACTical design extends network meta-analysis principles to individual patient randomization.
- Patients are randomly assigned to clinically reasonable regimens based on individual factors like antimicrobial susceptibility, toxicity, and physician assessment.
- Analysis utilizes direct and indirect comparisons across the treatment network, similar to network meta-analysis.
Main Results:
- The PRACTical design aims to maximize treatment relevance for individual patients.
- It enables identification and ranking of the most effective and safest regimens from a network of options.
- This approach addresses the urgent need for evidence on optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections.
Conclusions:
- The PRACTical design offers a robust framework for conducting clinical trials in the context of antimicrobial resistance.
- It facilitates the identification of superior treatment regimens by leveraging network meta-analysis principles with personalized randomization.
- This innovative approach is crucial for improving patient outcomes and combating the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.
More Related Videos
08:46Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management