Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Evaluation of a covariate-constrained randomization procedure in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials
Erin Leister Chaussee1, L Miriam Dickinson2, Diane L Fairclough1
1Adult & Child Consortium for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Abstract:
In stepped wedge (SW) designs, differing cluster-level characteristics or individual-level covariate distributions that differ by cluster can lead to imbalance by treatment arm and potential confounding of the treatment effect. Adapting a method used in cluster-randomized trials, we propose a covariate-constrained randomization method to be used in SW designs. First, we define a balance metric to be calculated for all possible randomizations of cluster order for a given SW design. The resulting distribution of this balance metric across all possible randomizations is used to select a candidate set of randomizations with acceptable covariate balance. One cluster order is selected at random from this candidate set to be used as the cluster order for treatment implementation. In a simulation study, we implement the covariate-constrained randomization procedure and compare treatment effect estimation, type I error, and power under varying SW design and confounding settings, and using multiple analysis methods. We observed optimal statistical properties when the balance metric was used to exclude a small set of potential randomizations with the highest level of imbalance, and when analysis methods were adjusted for the potential confounders. The covariate-constrained randomization was most beneficial in settings with a small number of clusters and in the presence of cluster-level confounding.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

