Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025
Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
A retrospective comparison of thromboelastography and conventional coagulation parameters for periprosthetic joint
1Department of Joint Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China; Department of Joint Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Purpose:
The diagnostic significance of coagulation parameters in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is currently attracting increasing attention. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of thromboelastography (TEG) for PJI and compared the values of various coagulation indicators for PJI diagnosis and reimplantation timing.
Methods:
We enrolled 250 patients undergoing revision for aseptic failure (Group A), revision for PJI (Group B), or reimplantation (Group C) during 2013-2020. C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), representative coagulation-related indicators (reaction time [R], clotting time [K], angle and maximum amplitude [MA]) of TEG and routine coagulation indicators, including fibrinogen, D-dimer, fibrin degradation product (FDP), platelets count (PC), mean platelet volume (MPV), distribution width (PDW) and plateletcrit (PCT) as well as PC/MPV ratio(PVR)were measured preoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the utility of all tested indicators for assessing infection.
Results:
All the indicators showed significant differences between groups A and B (P < 0.05) and, except for D-dimer, FDP, MPV and R, between groups B and C (P < 0.05). Similar differences were also observed in biomarkers before first-stage revision and second-stage reimplantation. ROC curves showed that fibrinogen, K, angle and MA outperformed the other coagulation indicators, with areas under the curve of 0.864 to 0.893 and threshold values of 3.55 g/L, 1.2 min, 72.4 deg and 69.1 mm, respectively. The multiple tests of TEG indices (K, angle and MA) and traditional inflammatory markers (CRP and ESR) or conventional coagulation indicators (fibrinogen, PC and PVR) had good sensitivity and specificity for PJI diagnosis, and the diagnostic values of TEG and platelet-associated indicators (PC and PVR) varied in the different subgroups.
Conclusion:
TEG was closely related to PJI and could serve as a valuable technique for identifying residual infection before reimplantation. Fibrinogen showed high diagnostic accuracy for PJI and effectively guided the timing of reimplantation.
