Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Syngeneic Mouse Orthotopic Allografts to Model Pancreatic Cancer
Published on: October 4, 2022
The Transcription Factor SLUG Uncouples Pancreatic Cancer Progression from the RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 Pathway
Faiz Bilal1,2, Enrique J Arenas1,2, Kim Pedersen1
1Preclinical Research Programs, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract:
Activating mutations in some isoforms of RAS or RAF are drivers of a substantial proportion of cancers. The main Raf effector, MEK1/2, can be targeted with several highly specific inhibitors. The clinical activity of these inhibitors seems to be mixed, showing efficacy against mutant BRAF-driven tumors but not KRAS-driven tumors, such as pancreatic adenocarcinomas. To improve our understanding of this context-dependent efficacy, we generated pancreatic cancer cells resistant to MEK1/2 inhibition, which were also resistant to KRAS and ERK1/2 inhibitors. Compared with parental cells, inhibitor-resistant cells showed several phenotypic changes including increased metastatic ability in vivo. The transcription factor SLUG, which is known to induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, was identified as the key factor responsible for both resistance to MEK1/2 inhibition and increased metastasis. Slug, but not similar transcription factors, predicted poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients and induced the transition to a cellular phenotype in which cell-cycle progression becomes independent of the KRAS-RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway. SLUG was targeted using two independent strategies: (i) inhibition of the MEK5-ERK5 pathway, which is responsible for upregulation of SLUG upon MEK1/2 inhibition, and (ii) direct PROTAC-mediated degradation. Both strategies were efficacious in preclinical pancreatic cancer models, paving the path for the development of more effective therapies against pancreatic cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that SLUG confers resistance to MEK1/2 inhibitors in pancreatic cancer by uncoupling tumor progression from KRAS-RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signaling, providing new therapeutic opportunities. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/14/3849/F1.large.jpg.
Insights
Pancreatic cancer cells resistant to MEK inhibitors develop increased metastasis due to SLUG. Targeting SLUG or its upstream pathway shows promise for new pancreatic cancer therapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Activating mutations in RAS/RAF drive many cancers, with MEK1/2 inhibitors showing mixed efficacy.
- MEK1/2 inhibitors are effective against BRAF-mutant tumors but not KRAS-driven cancers like pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand context-dependent efficacy of MEK1/2 inhibitors in pancreatic cancer.
- To identify mechanisms of resistance to MEK1/2 inhibition and associated metastatic potential.
Main Methods:
- Generated MEK1/2 inhibitor-resistant pancreatic cancer cells.
- Identified the transcription factor SLUG as key mediator of resistance and metastasis.
- Investigated SLUG's role in decoupling cell-cycle progression from the KRAS-RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway.
- Targeted SLUG via MEK5-ERK5 pathway inhibition and PROTAC-mediated degradation.
Main Results:
- Resistant cells exhibited increased metastatic ability in vivo.
- SLUG upregulation conferred resistance to MEK1/2, KRAS, and ERK1/2 inhibitors.
- SLUG predicted poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients.
- Targeting SLUG pathways demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models.
Conclusions:
- SLUG drives MEK1/2 inhibitor resistance and metastasis in pancreatic cancer by bypassing KRAS-RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signaling.
- Targeting SLUG or the MEK5-ERK5 pathway offers novel therapeutic strategies for pancreatic cancer.
Related Concept Videos
MAPK Signaling Cascades
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
Master Transcription Regulators
Cell Specific Gene Expression
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...

