Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography
Published on: June 21, 2024
Hydronephrosis Classifications: Has UTD Overtaken APD and SFU? A Worldwide Survey
Santiago Vallasciani1, Anna Bujons Tur2, John Gatti3
1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Pediatric urologists worldwide show no consensus on a single hydronephrosis grading system. Familiarity drives preference for the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) and Androgenetic Alopecia (APD) systems, highlighting a need for a universal standard.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Medical Imaging Reporting
- Urologic Ultrasound
Background:
- Standardized reporting of pediatric hydronephrosis is crucial for consistent patient management.
- Current ultrasonographic reporting systems lack universal adoption and consensus among specialists.
- Variations in reporting can lead to misinterpretation and challenges in comparative studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess current preferences and baseline information on ultrasonographic reporting systems for pediatric hydronephrosis.
- To identify factors influencing the choice of reporting systems among pediatric urologists globally.
- To evaluate the potential for a unified global system for hydronephrosis classification.
Main Methods:
- A 13-item multiple-choice questionnaire was distributed internationally to pediatric urologists, pediatric surgeons, and urologists.
- Statistical analysis included univariate, bivariate, and multivariate approaches to evaluate survey data.
- Data from 380 respondents across all continents were analyzed to determine reporting preferences and influencing factors.
Main Results:
- The Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) and Androgenetic Alopecia (APD) systems are most preferred due to familiarity and simplicity (37% and 34%).
- Imaging providers most frequently use the mild-moderate-severe system or APD measurements (28% and 39%), with a regional exception in North America favoring SFU (50%).
- Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences based on geographical area, experience, and case volume, though multivariate analysis showed no significant differences.
Conclusions:
- There is no single preferred pediatric hydronephrosis classification system among surveyed specialists.
- The primary limitation identified across all systems is the lack of universal utilization.
- While APD and SFU are currently favored, the newer Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD) system, combining elements of both, may evolve into a future universal standard.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

