Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
Neurocognitive Features of Motor Premanifest Individuals With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
Ellen van der Plas1, Timothy R Koscik1, Vincent Magnotta1
1Department of Psychiatry (E.v.d.P., T.R.K., P.N.), Department of Radiology (V.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.G.), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics; and Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology (S.A.C., D.M.), University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Objective:
The goal of the study was to identify brain and functional features associated with premanifest phases of adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 (i.e., PreDM1).
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included 68 healthy adults (mean age = 43.4 years, SD = 12.9), 13 individuals with PreDM1 (mean age: 47.4 years, SD = 16.3), and 37 individuals with manifest DM1 (mean age = 45.2 years, SD = 9.3). The primary outcome measures included fractional anisotropy (FA), motor measures (Muscle Impairment Rating Scale, Grooved Pegboard, Finger-Tapping Test, and grip force), general cognitive abilities (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales), sleep quality (Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Sleep), and apathy (Apathy Evaluation Scale).
Results:
Individuals with PreDM1 exhibited an intermediate level of white matter FA abnormality, where whole-brain FA was lower relative to healthy controls (difference of the estimated marginal mean [EMMdifference] = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.03, p < 0.001), but the PreDM1 group had significantly higher FA than did individuals with manifest DM1 (EMMdifference = 0.02, 95% CI 0.009-0.03, p < 0.001). Individuals with PreDM1 exhibited reduced performance on the finger-tapping task relative to control peers (EMMdifference = 5.70, 95% CI 0.51-11.00, p = 0.03), but performance of the PreDM1 group was better than that of the manifest DM1 group (EMMdifference = 5.60, 95% CI 0.11-11.00, p = 0.05). Hypersomnolence in PreDM1 was intermediate between controls (EMMdifference = -1.70, 95% CI -3.10-0.35, p = 0.01) and manifest DM1 (EMMdifference = -2.10, 95% CI -3.50-0.60, p = 0.006).
Conclusions:
Our findings highlight key CNS and functional deficits associated with PreDM1, offering insight in early disease course.
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Satellite Stem Cells and Muscular Dystrophy
Motor Units
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...

