Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

08:47
Mimicking and Measuring Occlusal Erosive Tooth Wear with the "Rub&Roll" and Non-contact Profilometry
Published on: February 2, 2018
12.4K
Awake Bruxism-Single-Point Self-Report versus Ecological Momentary Assessment
Alona Emodi-Perlman1, Daniele Manfredini2, Tamar Shalev1
1Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriella School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|April 30, 2021
Summary
Assessing awake bruxism (AB) is challenging. A smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) shows promise, but teeth grinding and contact reporting may need refinement for accurate AB evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Behavioral Science
- Digital Health
Background:
- Assessing awake bruxism (AB) during daytime activities is difficult due to limitations of continuous monitoring.
- Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) using smartphone applications offers a novel, semi-instrumental approach for real-time data collection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between single-point self-report measures and EMA for assessing awake bruxism.
- To determine the reliability and validity of EMA in capturing different masticatory muscle activity states.
Main Methods:
- Participants used a smartphone application to report masticatory muscle activity status at least 12 times daily over a week.
- Reported states included: relaxed muscles, muscle bracing without tooth contact, teeth contact, teeth clenching, and teeth grinding.
- Comparison was made between EMA data and single-point self-report questions defining AB-positive and AB-negative subjects.
Main Results:
- The most frequently reported state via EMA was relaxed muscles (approx. 60%), while teeth grinding was least frequent (<1%).
- Relaxed muscles exhibited the lowest variance over the seven-day reporting period.
- Only relaxed muscles and muscle bracing conditions demonstrated acceptable ability to differentiate between AB-positive and AB-negative subjects based on single-point self-reports.
Conclusions:
- Combining self-report with EMA may enhance awake bruxism assessment capabilities.
- Revisiting the reporting conditions for teeth contact and teeth grinding within EMA protocols is recommended for improved awake bruxism evaluation.

