Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025
Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Thrombogenicity of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Quantitative Thrombodynamics Study
Jane S Kim1, Luigi Gonzales2, Jacob Lester2
1Division of Eye Plastic, Orbital and Facial Cosmetic Surgery, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Purpose:
At present, there is a paucity of data regarding the thrombogenicity of hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs). This article quantitatively analyses the thrombogenicity of 2 commonly used HAFs: Restylane Lyft and Juvéderm Ultra.
Methods:
Thrombogenicity was assessed using the Thrombodynamics Analyzer System and plasma obtained from healthy controls. Following the addition of HAFs or control, spontaneous clot formation time, initial rate of clot growth, average rate of clot growth over 30 minutes, and clot size at 30 minutes was measured for each sample. The median of differences between each group were analyzed.
Results:
Nine individuals with a mean (SD) age of 37 (17) years, participated in the study. Initial rate of clot growth was significantly lower in plasma mixed with Juvéderm compared to control (p = 0.008) or Restylane (p = 0.038). The average rate of clot growth more than 30 minutes was significantly lower in both HAF groups (Restylane vs. control p = 0.038; Juvéderm vs. control p = 0.008), there was no significant difference between HAF groups (p = 0.635). Final clot size was significantly smaller with Juvéderm (p = 0.038 vs. control and p = 0.013 vs. Restylane). Spontaneous clot formation time did not significantly change with the addition of either HAF.
Conclusions:
Juvéderm significantly reduces the initial rate of clot growth, the average rate of clot growth more than 30 minutes, and clot size, whereas the addition of Restylane decreases the average rate of clot growth without affecting overall clot size in healthy individuals.
