Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

534
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
534

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulation of Right Temporal Cortex Enhances Talker Typicality Judgments.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Measuring age-related differences in phonetic gradiency with the visual analogue scale and eye tracking.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Word Learning in Aphasia: Does Time of Day Matter?

American journal of speech-language pathology·2026
Same author

Measuring brain sensitivity to semantic distance in spoken narrative comprehension.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Accented Speech Perception in Noise After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Insights into effortful adaptation during speech perception: The role of dopamine, norepinephrine, and prediction error.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.6K

Sentence predictability modulates cortical response to phonetic ambiguity.

Hannah Mechtenberg1, Xin Xie2, Emily B Myers3

  • 1Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Mansfield, CT 06269, USA.

Brain and Language
|April 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals how the brain processes ambiguous speech sounds. Semantic context and phonetic competition interact, impacting neural responses in key language areas.

Keywords:
Semantic predictabilitySpeech perceptionfMRI

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.8K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

643

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.6K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.8K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

643

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Phonetic categories lack clear boundaries, leading to acoustic ambiguity in speech sounds.
  • Top-down information, like lexical and semantic cues, aids in resolving phoneme identity in continuous speech.
  • Understanding the interplay between phonetic ambiguity and top-down linguistic constraints is crucial for speech perception research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the interaction between phonetic ambiguity and semantic predictability during speech perception.
  • To examine how the brain integrates acoustic-phonetic information with higher-level linguistic context.
  • To identify brain regions sensitive to both phonetic competition and semantic context.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity.
  • Participants passively listened to sentences with varying semantic predictability and phonetic competition.
  • A controlled experimental design manipulated acoustic-semantic variables.

Main Results:

  • The left middle frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, and anterior inferior frontal gyrus showed sensitivity to both semantic predictability and phonetic competition.
  • Increased phonetic competition in semantically non-predictive contexts elicited a negative-graded neural response.
  • These findings indicate distinct neural processing for varying levels of linguistic uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Neural networks integrate phonetic and semantic information to resolve ambiguity in continuous speech.
  • Phonetic uncertainty may interact with semantic uncertainty, potentially disrupting coherent meaning construction.
  • The study highlights the dynamic interplay between low-level acoustic processing and high-level cognitive functions in speech perception.