Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Defibrillation Safety Margin Testing in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Results From the NCDR
Jordan M Prutkin1, Yongfei Wang2, Carolina A Escudero3
1Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Insights
Defibrillation safety margin (DSM) testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion is safe for congenital heart disease (CHD) patients, though performed less often over time. Inadequate DSM did not correlate with adverse in-hospital outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Congenital Heart Disease
Background:
- Limited data exists on defibrillation safety margin (DSM) testing prevalence and safety in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).
- Understanding DSM testing is crucial for safe implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze predictors of DSM testing during ICD insertion.
- To identify factors associated with inadequate DSM in CHD patients.
- To assess the safety and outcomes of DSM testing in CHD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of transvenous ICD procedures in CHD patients (April 2010-March 2016) from the NCDR ICD Registry.
- DSM testing and adequacy were assessed, with inadequate DSM defined as lowest successful energy <10 J.
- Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate associations with complications, death, and prolonged hospital stay.
Main Results:
- DSM testing was performed in 52.0% of ICD recipients; the mean lowest successful energy was 20.7 ± 7.3 J.
- An inadequate DSM occurred in 13.8% of patients with available data.
- DSM testing was not linked to in-hospital complications or death but was associated with reduced prolonged hospital stays (p < 0.0001).
- Inadequate DSM was not associated with worse in-hospital outcomes.
Conclusions:
- DSM testing is performed less frequently over time in CHD patients undergoing ICD procedures and appears safe.
- An inadequate DSM in this cohort was not associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes.
- Continued evaluation of DSM testing practices in CHD is warranted.
Objectives:
This study analyzed the predictors of defibrillation safety margin (DSM) testing at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion and factors associated with inadequate DSM in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).
Background:
There are few data about the prevalence and safety of DSM testing in those with CHD.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients with atrial or ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great vessels, Ebstein anomaly, or common ventricle undergoing a transvenous ICD procedure in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ICD Registry from April 2010 to March 2016, and DSM testing was assessed. Inadequate DSM was defined as a lowest successful energy tested <10 J than the maximum output of the ICD generator.
Results:
Of all ICD recipients (N = 7,024), DSM testing was performed in 52.0% (n = 3,654). The mean lowest successful energy tested was 20.7 ± 7.3 J. Of those with DSM adequacy data available (n = 3,623), an inadequate DSM occurred in 13.8% (n = 501). After multivariable adjustment, DSM testing was not associated with in-hospital complications or death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 1.28) but was associated with lower odds of prolonged hospital stay (>3 days) (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.84; p < 0.0001). An inadequate DSM was not associated with in-hospital death or complications (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.04) or prolonged hospital stay (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.995 to 1.81).
Conclusions:
DSM testing is being performed less frequently over time and seems safe in those with CHD. An inadequate DSM was not associated with worse in-hospital outcomes.
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
10:05Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias